Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which
adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how
these examples shape your position.
Government offering gratis education for the denizens of a milieu will obviously help proliferate the number of literates in that community. Consequently, this will lead to increase in innovation. However, this magnanimous act also comes with myriads of adversaties which include increase in tax levied on the citizens, decline in the value of education, and extinction of weighty vocational trainings. Hence, government should make education free from rudimentary to secondary level, while tertiary education should be subsidized.
To begin with, free education, which is crucial to the development of a nation, will have an averse effect on the economy. This is as a result the pecuniary burden associated with free education. A quorum of the public funds, which is also needed to fund other momentous sectors of the economy such health and transportation will be devote to education sector. This will lead to an increase in monetary burden on the government. Consequently, tax levied on citizens will be increased and the economy will become more austere.
Apart from free education leading to increase in economic hardship, it will also lead to sharp decline in the quality and value of education. With education made available at no cost, student will become oblivious of the value of such necessity. School pupils will no longer be wary of failure as prolonged learnining time will be the only consequence of failure, which in most cases, is considered trivial. Hence, education will become bagatelle and this will gravely affect the prodigies that are churned out of such learning system.
On the contrary, a reasonable individual might cavil that free education will offset students financial burden. Further, they might also contend that cost-free learning will increase the availability of education to the vulgars and peons. This is true to some extent. But we also need to consider the effect of free form of education on other vocational skills. Communities need quotidian skills such as tailoring, fishing and farming to thrive. With the advent of free education, most of these skills will be neglected. The upshot of this is the gradual extinction of these intrinsic skill and thus, the gradual decline of the settlement’s economy.
In summary, provision of free education to the hoi-polloi will serve numerouse advantage as it will make education available for the common people, increase literacy in a society and spur innovation. However, the form of education system also comes withs its own disadvantages. These demerits include gradual decrease in educational value, defunct of vocational skills and increase in tax levied on citizens. Therefore, education, which is necessary for a nation to develop, should b made free from primary to secondary level while tertiary level should be subsidized to retain its value and make education available for common people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vantages. These demerits include gradual decrease in educational value, defunct o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, in summary, such as, as a result, in most cases, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35964912281 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87276014425 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5774040381 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.833333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146890865615 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519086342751 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385656576033 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103344251287 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301704312859 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.