The authors’ recommendation states that the government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. Authors recommendation is not a feasible one because it has more demerits than merits if we adopt it. I disagree with the authors’ advice explaining the reasoning for the same.
The plan for free education creates a problem for funding universities. This plan is especially true in the current economic climate. The government afford to fund the universities to provide free education solely. Thus, the policy creates more financial problems for the government, for example, In the city like San francisco, which is very expensive to live. If the government adopts such a policy to provide free education in the towns like San francisco, the more significant part of the revenue from the tax will go to fund those universities leaving little room for providing different services.
Secondly, as students are also humans too, Humans have a tendency not to value something, if it doesn’t require any sacrifice on our side to gain it. The same analogy, the students, won’t appreciate the education much, and won’t invest their time learning those important things via learning provided by the university. For example, Taking the same standard as above for city, San francisco if the government invest a considerable part of their revenue in training the individuals to become the future of this world. If the students didn’t learn enough, that they can’t even apply what they have learned, it would be a waste of money, time and hard work behind training these young individuals.
However, the policy should be changed a little bit, like education should be free for those students who are in need off. The needy students are those who can’t attend the university they wish to pursue their studies on, because of financial constraints they have on them. For example, in the city of San Francisco, the minimum amount one needs to pursue master’s education would be around $70000, which is equivalent to INR 56 lacks, which is enormous for a lower- and middle-class family. Though some university does provide full fees relaxation to those brilliant students and their families by providing them with financial aid.
To sum up, the above recommendation is noble, but the unfeasible policy for the government, under the current economic climate. Free education should be provided to needy and meritorious students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...However, the policy should be changed a little bit, like education should be free for thos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32658227848 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95993218265 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508860759494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6327547011 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21407082676 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832359361363 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789423460971 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137968606444 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706358491215 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.