Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The above statement have logical grounds as it states that education should be provided to the deserving candidates and should not be a monopoly of the rich. Education is a fundamental right of everyone.
Firstly, In most of the cases the fees of the educational institutions act as barrier for the serious candidates. An Indian survey in 2015 showed that most of the students were not able to study because they were having monetary issues. This has led the people from the poor families to go for government jobs after graduation and not for higher studies. Which has inturn led to decrease in the number of skilled professionals.
Secondly, the wrong selection of candidates in universities has led to an overall degradation of the quantity as well as the quality of the scientists. Therefore, it is a disgrace to the entire country as research representatives of the country are not very much serious about their duties. The overall number of patents and journals would be at a constantly decreasing rate and will not be improved if the basic level of intake is improvised.
The people in the opposition would say that the institutions are going to suffer huge amount of loss if they provide the best facilites to the individuals who are not paying them, on this the institutions can look forward for some alternatives as requesting the government provide funds, or asking the students to pay the fees from the salaries after the completion of the course.
In a nutshell, for the nation and the reputation of the college it is important to select the right candidates and not just select people based on their family background. Providing the right eductaion to the right consumer is the primary duty of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... graduation and not for higher studies. Which has inturn led to decrease in the numbe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8976109215 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89230571151 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522184300341 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9920134902 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101339234397 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314312433174 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031207877917 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506507982121 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339094947562 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.