Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Nowadays, financial issue, especially, in education has gotten important for governments. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether we should spend money on a student who encountering difficulties with tuition or not. I believe that support funds for these students. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, preparing a budget for students having problem with tuition have impressive effects on society in the future. To put on the other hand, teaching and training students who have the potential to reach a good place in the future can have more advantages than spending money on them without refunding. To easily perceive my words, let's consider Dr.Hesabi, a famous Iranian scientist, he was born in a poor family but with the help of funds and free tuition, he got the opportunity to help his society in the future and be a good scientist for his country.
Furthermore, funding poor students not only influence on society but also impact on the student. To be specific, when the student, unlike a bad situation which he is meeting, has money for education and university, he can concentrate on lessons, hence he is going to be on his high performance. regard an example to drive this fact home, the student who has to be in class at 8 in the morning but he has to work until midnight to prepare money for his university, surely he loses his concentration.
Without any shadow of a doubt, free tuition has own negative effects. It is true, sometimes the student, who has a fund for perpetuating his education leave his university or during the years of university, he decides to change his way. All of these are problems with free tuition, but with passing strict laws we can prevent these happenings. For example, we can pass a law which compels students having free tuition just have two opportunities to change their fields or they have to refund their money if they don't use it very well.
In conclusion, I do believe funding poor students is a good choice. Since it has positive effects on society and also the student who has a problem with tuition. However, we should enact favorable rules to limit these students from abusing this grant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ending money on them without refunding. To easily perceive my words, lets consider...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hesabi
...ily perceive my words, lets consider Dr.Hesabi, a famous Iranian scientist, he was bor...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regard
...is going to be on his high performance. regard an example to drive this fact home, the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...they have to refund their money if they dont use it very well. In conclusion, I do ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77925636241 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528947368421 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8876709122 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.470588235 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204639928584 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715902868982 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500279707186 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12692687836 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400156445161 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.