Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The statement proposing to help out poor students with their tuition fees throughout the university by the government expresses some humanitarian considerations. Education, although being a basic human right, sometimes remains unaffordable to many people. This particularly happens in case of financially insolvent people. For example, there are frequent reports on the newspaper about poor, brilliant students who reach out to the society to help them overcome this obstacle. The extent to what their dreams get fulfilled, however, remains in question.
The passage is trying to offer a solution to the poor kids' university education by government. The usual case is, the poor students are more keen to study, but the financial hurdle poses a difficult situation for them. But, if they are given the chance, they will try their level-best to achieve their dreams. They have known the pain to not have, so if they are provided with such opportunities, they will surely try to make the best out of them.
Speaking about the merits of this solution, government should consider this as an investment. Because, these are the students that, when graduated or having finished their studies, can join the workforce and make some real-world contribution to the country. The knowledge-base that they would create will help the country in ways that can be only imagined.
However, this is in fact true that paying tuition fees by the government begs a question about the ability of the government to do such a thing. If the country is struggling hard economically, then it would not be wise to spend its limited resources on something other than its primary need. So, the policy becomes numb if a case like this occurs.
Then again, there are always possibilities for foreign aid in educational sector. This is very common that the poorer countries receive financial aid from international non-governmental organizations who try to build an educated base out of that country. For instance, the UNO and UNESCO have such programs.
Not everyone will have the same ability, whether it is financial, or it is based on merit. So, if a student has come this far based on his merit, his dreams should not be shattered just because he can not make it money-wise. Even though it might seem an over-expenditure for the government momentarily, this investment can be proven fruitful in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
... trying to offer a solution to the poor kids university education by government. The...
^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ids university education by government. The usual case is, the poor students are mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in fact, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11224489796 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91843424356 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.202441631 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141894902557 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039902670465 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522967499616 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691007835451 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261401053392 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.