In our society college education is considered very important to improve the life and career of someone, since the market have become very competitive. However, not everybody is able to pay for college education. In this sense, it’s important the government offer support to students in a situation of indulgence since governments should promote equal opportunities to everybody.
Some might say that free tuition fees for students that don’t have monetary conditions to pay for a university is a mistaken choice. For them, government would have to spend a lot of money in an action that would not solve problems like inequality and lack of good opportunities since this kind of problems are not answered in superior education but on the basis of a society. Try to solve social problems by funding poor students would only attenuate these problems. Besides, this sort of investment would mean that government might withdraw to put money in the basis of the educational public system in order to invest in students that might not even be successful in their college.
While this perspective might make sense, it doesn’t cover important elements in this subject. It’s necessary to remember that governments need to promote equal opportunities to everybody. That’s why we are so concerned about the public education in our countries because this system should be good enough for every student to develop their abilities and have a good future. For this same reason government should offer support for people that don’t have money to pay for it. Nations should offer the same opportunities for those who had the capacity to be accepted in universities but can’t afford the tuitions. It’s unfair to imagine a student that was approved in a great university but don’t have money to pay for it.
In this sense, while countries like Brazil still struggle in many aspects with the quality of it educational system it’s possible to see this system as a positive one in funding poor students in universities. Brazilian better universities are public and the better universities doesn’t require tuition fees. Moreover, students that are poor might have scholarships to fund themselves with things related to food, housing and transport. Many Brazilians saw it as way to spend money in something considered not useful to answer the educational problems of the country. However, this action allowed many students to get a college degree and improve their quality of life. The actual Brazilian generation has the highest level in history of people with a college degree and in many cases young Brazilians were the first of their families to arrive at this educational level.
In conclusion, one can see many positive aspects in governments helping students to pay for their tuition fees. Governments have all conditions to create good filters where it can judge the financial conditions of a student and then offer scholarships to the ones that don’t have money. Certainly this attitude it’s not the ultimate solution for social problems and education quality, however it’s a good way to help with these struggles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27613412229 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86778769781 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431952662722 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1649996298 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.590909091 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0454545455 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172959820032 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631988215078 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050620239413 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107848702004 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283515050109 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.