When a discovery is made in any field, there is a variety of reasons why it was possible to achieve that revolutionary answer to a certain question. In this sense, it could be discussed what makes possible to realize important contribution in a certain field. Some say that a genius may appear and find cogent answers for some subject without have a solid basis about that subject, others believe that it requires effort in understanding past knowledge in order to develop a work that can make a great contribution to a certain field. Evidences demonstrates that a solid background about the field is more important to keep knowledge evolving.
It’s possible that someone might say that great contributions within a subject could come from discoveries made by a genius or even from not expected events which involves aspect such as lucky. Take the example of the explorers that discovery America, such as Cristovan Colombo. History states that Colombo never wanted to discovery a new continent, since he was looking for a new commercial route trough the sea. However, he was able to find the American continent without any intention to do that. He didn’t have any knowledge or previous information about the possibility to exist this continent, yet many will say that lucky made Colombo a famous explorer thanks to this discovery.
However, we cannot state the importance of previous knowledge in any field when we talk about make contributions to a subject. To develop skills and try to understand how fields work inside a certain are is very important if someone is looking for give contributions to this area. Using the same example of the European explorers, we can affirm that even considering they did not intend to discover that lands, they have a previous knowledge developed for many navigators before Colombo that allowed the discoverers of the new world to travel for longer distances than before with more safety. While luck might have helped navigators to find these lands, they had a background in the navigation field that allowed them do this kind of exploration.
Moreover, the development of the spatial program in our modern society is also an example of the importance in respect previous knowledge. The spatial programs trough the world evolved decades by decades, always respecting the development achieved before. This resulted in the series of explorations made the Apollo’s space crafts that allowed astronauts to explore the moon in several missions. The discoveries and achievements in this field was only possible because previous knowledge were respected by the ones who participated in these programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'programs'' or 'program's'?
Suggestion: programs'; program's
...respect previous knowledge. The spatial programs trough the world evolved decades by dec...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17674418605 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87024608726 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0743476199 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.941176471 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2941176471 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146642687375 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522226986661 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468328521164 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908246475432 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520442739687 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.