Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The idea of a free university education sounds really amazing and would be good if it can be implemented, however, there are any complications that will arise in implementing it.
We all know that the students of now are the future of any nation. It should be a responsibility of government to provide basic education to all, so that everyone is literate and get a exposure to basics of logic and literature. However, providing free education to all the admits who cannot afford it can be quite impossible and bring in complications unthought of.
Firstly, university education is quite expensive. Students join university to hone their technical skills and excel at one thing. Providing such technical education for free will require huge amount of funding from the state. There can be some countries who might afford to do so, but talking in general, most of the countries will have other major priorities to fulfill than to provide free university education. For example, investment in infrastructures like road connecting major cities, hydro power plants etc. will accelerate the development of any country than its investment in education. Investment in education is important as well, but for countries with mid range economy, it will be hard to overlook all other present necessities and investment huge amount of money in free education. Furthermore, investment in infrastructure will increase the job opportunities for the students after job. So, taking up some loan in front for education will be worth it in such a scenario, where return on investment is secured once students complete their education. But simply funding education for all will be too much when a state has other priorities.
Secondly, the number of students which the state should fund has no limit. If all the students who are admitted to university cannot afford education, it will be almost impossible for the government to fund all the students. Moreover, what will be the matrix to determine whether a student can afford his education or not? If all students who cannot afford their education will be funded by the government , there will be rise in cases where students will feign their in-affordability to pay in order to secure the funding. Furthermore, it will be injustice to the students who are good at study , if other students who are not as good and who have not worked any hard get the scholarships. The scholarships thus should be provided on the basis of merit, students who cannot afford must work hard to prove themselves that they deserve funding. Providing such limited merit base scholarship not only will ease the financial burden but also trigger competency among students resulting in a good overall education.
Thirdly, fees for education in any university are there for a reason. Every university requires some amount to conduct there daily operations , maintain the facilities and to hire the best minds as faculties. Government funding will undermine these necessities. Moreover, providing full free education can hinder the quality of education that is provided in any university. Furthermore, there are other consequences that can result from such funding. For example, many students who have been awarded funding just because they could not afford it might grow complacent and may not clear the courses on time. This is where merit based scholarship will come handy.
In sum, though education is a necessary tool and everyone should have access to it, it should be limited to high school or other basic levels. Providing funding for scholarships in expense of spending in other development works will only impede the pace of development of any country. the best measure will then be to provide merit based scholarships for few where the under-previleged can also fight for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l, so that everyone is literate and get a exposure to basics of logic and literat...
^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ucation will be funded by the government , there will be rise in cases where stude...
^^
Line 4, column 595, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce to the students who are good at study , if other students who are not as good a...
^^
Line 4, column 835, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to fund'.
Suggestion: to fund
...d to prove themselves that they deserve funding. Providing such limited merit base scho...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...amount to conduct there daily operations , maintain the facilities and to hire the...
^^
Line 6, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the pace of development of any country. the best measure will then be to provide me...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 41.0 12.4196629213 330% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3170.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 618.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12944983819 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98594081286 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91316320281 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436893203883 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1015.2 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9569570998 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.258064516 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.935483871 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1935483871 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324474626341 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996724361742 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790507755633 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19501447723 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893191464257 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.