Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
At present, where there is continuous decline in biodiversity, protection of wilderness and biodiversity should remain any nations priority for sure. While passing laws to preserve wilderness areas in their state seems sensible, such laws should not be too stringent to forbid possible benefit from development works. To be clear, laws should be placed but should not be too stringent to overlook possible economic gains from development.
Firstly, all nations and civilizations have survived and evolved by utilizing natural resources that were available to them. Exploiting nature is a means of survival for almost all living creatures. What should not happen is over exploitation of resources. But when the question comes to the survival and fulfilling basic needs, utilizing nature is the most. Similarly, all great civilizations have developed at the expense of utilization of resources. In fact, in most cases we can see a direct correlation between development of a civilizations and its extensive utilization of natural resources.
Secondly, preservation of any wilderness should be considered taking into account how impactful it's conservation will be in terms of protecting biodiversity. Thus, laws should be placed based on cases.For example, there was an incident during the construction of Melamchi Drinking water project which is being constructed to supply water to almost 70 million residents of Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. Kathmandu has faced the problem of drinking water for decades. Almost half of it's population has no access to clean drinking water. The project aimed to bring relief to the people of Kathmandu Valley. The problem arose when one of the international agencies presented a report that constructing the project will almost eradicate a rare species of butterfly from the region. Now, such situation may arise where we must weigh the consequences of our actions before taking any decision. The relief that the project will the millions of people clearly outweighs the minor environmental consequence. Consequently, the project continued later.
Moreover, most of the countries have already taken measures to protect their biodiversity by categorizing places as national parks and wildlife reserves. We must concede that preservation of biodiversity is important. However, there are cases where we have seen that preservation of biodiversity & development have gone hand in hand.
In sum, I would like to conclude that biodiversity protection is important and we should take measures to protect endangered species of flora and fauna. But implementing stringent plans to protect every wilderness- many of which may not have much importance in terms of biodiversity at the expense of fulfilling basic needs of people will only put society at jeopardy & hinder development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ness and biodiversity should remain any nations priority for sure. While passing laws t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect correlation between development of a civilizations and its extensive utilizat...
^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zations and its extensive utilization of natural resources. Secondly, preserva...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...s, laws should be placed based on cases.For example, there was an incident during t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54186046512 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09637351351 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532558139535 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5199395027 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.608695652 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6956521739 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52173913043 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285912987119 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697253297049 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845167614649 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149822787613 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147236179554 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.