Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I mostly agree with the prompt's assertion that Goverment should place few, if any restrictions on scientific research and development for two reasons. However, I agree with the fact that effective cautions and guidelines should be made available for developers in order to prevent unwarranted problems.
First of all, Scientific discoveries are the backbone of developed countries, there cannot be any development without research. For instance, two years ago, there was an outbreak of a diseases called 'Corona Virus', this virus affected almost the whole world. No underdevolped country provided the cure to the disease because they dont have well equiped laboratory to carry out experiments and researches. China, United states and some other developed countries were able to provide solution to the problem beacuse thay had a well equipped scientists and developers.
Secondly, research majorly deals with the ability to think, which helps to improve the thinking prowess of individuals. Placing a high restrictions on reseach will surely discourage people that are passionate about locating problems and creating solutions to it. Take for example, students studing chemistry in the universities. Their thinking prowess can only be finetuned when they are exposed to different types of research, experiments, problems and so on. If they must be exceptional and useful to the nation then, they must be well equipped.
However, without proper mentoring and guidelines, research can lead to a waste of time and resources. For example, a tyro in the field of science, can mix some chemicals together and the end product can be deleterious to a whole community.
In conclusion, if the world as a whole must improve, it needs innovations which can be done by researchers and developers. They should be well equipped to carry out their operations but be well monitored and guilded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
I mostly agree with the prompts assertion that Goverment should place f...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...development for two reasons. However, I agree with the fact that effective cautions and guidelines shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a disease' or simply 'diseases'?
Suggestion: a disease; diseases
...two years ago, there was an outbreak of a diseases called Corona Virus, this virus affecte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ed the cure to the disease because they dont have well equiped laboratory to carry o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'restriction'?
Suggestion: restriction
... prowess of individuals. Placing a high restrictions on reseach will surely discourage peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94385114897 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0278483338 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190079921644 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694249228452 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814702570712 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111402272668 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914063188846 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.