Scientific research and development play an important role in the development of any country. It helps any country to gain their power in international economic stage. However, we cannot neglect a fact that every good thing has its bad effect also and It depends upon us, how we are using them. Due to modern self-centered thinking of humans, restriction on Scientific research and development becomes necessary. Now people can go to any extreme to fulfill their personal requirements. So, i would say that the government should put restrictions on scientific research and development.
We know about the benefits of nuclear energy and recent development in this field created a new option to generate power. In this way we can save our limited nonrenewable energy sources and it can help us to control pollution produced by other sources of energy like coal etc. But in the same time we cannot forget about the tragedy happened during Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear explosion. Although it is very useful for humans but if it will be use in a wrong way it will create tragedy.
We are also aware of research and development in animal cloning and now scientists are trying to create human baby in their lab. Successful research will give a lot of benefits to society. Couples who cannot have their own baby can rely and fulfill their dream using this kind of research. But meantime we cannot neglect the fact that it is dangerous also if it will be used in a wrong way. Suppose some group of researchers started creating human baby in the lab and they started human trafficking to gain money so that they can fulfill their personal desire. So, in this case this kind of research will provoke various crimes.
To sum up, I would say that the government should put restrictions on Scientific research and development so that it can be only used for good intention otherwise it will act like a devil to our society. It is government responsibility to put restriction on those things so that it can not go into the hands of morally degraded people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ulfill their personal requirements. So, i would say that the government should pu...
^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...useful for humans but if it will be use in a wrong way it will create tragedy. We are also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...it is dangerous also if it will be used in a wrong way. Suppose some group of researchers star...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81019830028 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75547560251 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507082152975 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8858357834 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260521817996 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964660054599 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113499853845 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185147035904 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143071421794 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.