Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research ad development lay the foundation for a stronger and more powerful nation of tomorrow. In this era, where science and technology has made such unprecendented exponential progress over the last fifty or hundred years, nations have found a newer way of announcing their supremacy over others-through advancement in fields of research and development. I strongly agree with the view that governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development, as supported through valid arguments in the paragraphs to follow. This short communication shall try to justify the nuances and advenatages of an enriching research environment provided by the government.
It is often said that 'necessity is the mother of all inventions'. In the light of this statement, it is important to understand that inventions take place mostly as a solution to some underlying problem. Such situations occur the most in the face of crisis and unrest. Let us take the example of World Wars. It was during this period that the invention of so many machinery was made possible. The era had seen a gigantic amount of research-work in nuclear sciences. Although posed as a menace to mankind, science had evolved manifold times during this era through persistent study in a particular area. Coming to the main point of this discussion, it is essential to note that during these times of wars, government used to exercise the minimum restrictions possible in the fields of research. Much to the contrary, research was put on the state's priority as only monumental pathbreaking discoveries could lead to an edge of a fighting side over its counterpart. Thus, this period has been an example for the fact that minimum government intervention and least restrictions had proven positive externalities in discovery of new technologies.
Capitalist economists strongly propagate the notion of least government intervention for an efficient functioning of the market. The same logic can be monotonically stretched to the vast area of research and development as well. Let us take the condition where a particular top notch research has to undergo several protocols fixed by the government before it is approved. The time required for this, although apparently insignificant as compared to that devoted for the actual work, is large enough for the scientists to lose their motivation. As a result of trying conditions, it is possible for the researchers to underperform in the given conditions to come up with worse, even unconsiderable outcomes. It can thus be concluded that 'red-taping' by the government leads to loss of precision over time.
Finally, in a time constrained environment, where researches are bound to yield a strong, applicable outcome, government should enforce as little restrictions as possible, in order to let the work succeed. For example, in the present situation of the Covid-19 pandemic, we have all acknowledged the world in an apparent race to come up with vaccines as fast as possible. All the biomedical companies across the globe have tried several methods to produce results in a short span of time. Even the common mass have been waiting eagerly for the innoculation process to start. Now, any typical vaccine development process takes a good ten years to come into action-provided all protocols are correctly followed. However, in conditions of emergency, following all these standardized proccesses would mean addtional harm. The government, is therefore, bound to let the sceintists take their own call and place as fewer restrictions as possible.
Proponents against the afforementioned argument may counter these points stating that a certain degree of control should be enforced to ensure that science does not turn out to be a bane. But, does that not lead to the reduction of the efficiency of the system? By the end of the day, we all must agree that researches at the highest level are conducted by well trained professionals; and they themselves take huge responsibility to ensure the smooth functioning of their inventions. Thus, in such issues, government must refrain from imposing too many restrictions, lest it may topple down the entire system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...nential progress over the last fifty or hundred years, nations have found a newer way o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun machinery seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much machinery', 'a good deal of machinery'.
Suggestion: much machinery; a good deal of machinery
...ng this period that the invention of so many machinery was made possible. The era had seen a g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...o the contrary, research was put on the states priority as only monumental pathbreakin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the least'.
Suggestion: of the least
...conomists strongly propagate the notion of least government intervention for an efficien...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...s take the condition where a particular top notch research has to undergo several protoco...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3543.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 671.0 442.535393258 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28017883756 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08956458786 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14595995156 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 357.0 215.323595506 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532041728763 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 1090.8 704.065955056 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.956368678 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.290322581 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6451612903 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29032258065 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181938435114 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444259902394 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437207209694 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103563372511 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351803573696 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.