Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It won't be wrong to say that scientific research and development is what helps a country to set a milestone among others. In terms of scientific research many countries such as USA, China have proved themselves many times. This might not have been possible if there were numerous restrictions forged on their work. Although it is necessary to implicate few rules/limitations which would help then to work in discipline while acquiring success.
Firstly, we should know that these research groups always benefit the people in their country first then the whole world. Russia’s research team developed an effective covid 19 vaccine, which helped large number of masses. This wont be possible if they had restrictions like money issue, inadequate laboratories, permission to perform dangerous experiments, isolated space. These things if restricted cannot help any research facility progress.
As to speak the inventions and discoveries made helps fill countries treasury by wealth and pride. Other Countries can pay loyalty to use and build upon a country’s inventions.
Some local groups demand governments to restrict scientific research and development and channelize the resources to betterment of society. They tend to have limited thinking and for sure cant project issues of future. If they could they would know upcoming wars are bio wars which can be won only if a countries scientific infrastructure and scientist are strong, well-motived, knowledgeable. Whereas covid 19 was just start of it.
Finally governments should treat science and development structure critically as they are need of the era. Yet to maintain discipline, governments should impose responsibilities rather than restriction. For starters, Responsibility of use of natural resources, responsibility of saving earth, responsibility of saving economy.
The claim must be reconstructed as ‘Governments’ monitor and guide scientific research and development departments for better working’ this will lead to aa smooth hand in hand functioning for betterment of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rous restrictions forged on their work. Although it is necessary to implicate few rules/...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d to have limited thinking and for sure cant project issues of future. If they could...
^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a country' or simply 'countries'?
Suggestion: a country; countries
...s are bio wars which can be won only if a countries scientific infrastructure and scientist...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re strong, well-motived, knowledgeable. Whereas covid 19 was just start of it. Fina...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...reas covid 19 was just start of it. Finally governments should treat science and de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, well, whereas, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6935483871 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26187097986 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6656420636 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212163912627 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629454633195 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457827486684 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103459748125 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481488595744 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.