The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
the statement itself is what most of the people around the world would agree with, and like me completely agree with the claim made in the above statement. Following are reasons for my belief and supporting considerations.
It is cogent enough like how student asking questions understand better benefiting themselves, exactly it is how counter fronting authorities make tend to make your life easy increasing the standards of them. A dormant public indirectly gives authorities a sense of tolerance towards their work which helps in wellbeing of the society. Likewise, if the public doesn’t complain about bad roads authorities won't act upon repairing. On the contrary, if the society complains asks questions, the authority will start doing what suits better.
A similar case, which fits perfect as an example, of reelections held in a state of India. After elections, when results were declared the state was in a shock. Turned out that the results were not what the public wanted. Public started questioning the authorities. People marched to local offices for answers, requested the highest state authority to reexamine the process. It took several days after which a flaw was encountered which when resolved a desired result was stated.
Moreover, when people of Raigud, another province in India, questioned the expenditure of money allotted for slum development, it was found that some government officers channeled some money into their pockets. This impacted the slums and the society.
Events where the questioning attitude of people led to expose many flaws in the operations of the authorities. Not only on government authorities but also on corporate level., or be it on school level. This statement stands strong and will always hold merit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the statement itself is what most of the pe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 280.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78416623653 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7131281908 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6470588235 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205655620917 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054171971338 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333174942702 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102058119746 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314053827008 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.