The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The political system has long been a hot topic along with the rapid development of the society. A seemingly reasonable proposal is that when the majority of people within the society start to question authority, the overall well-being of the society will be enhanced. However, several consequences are likely to render the perspective immature.
Admittedly, we can't ignore the benefit of a society with sufficient questioning voices. Sometimes when the public tend to follow everything the government says, it would easily lead to dictatorship in which the leader possesses excessive power. If he makes some mistakes, it can be rather hard to correct them. By contrast, a society which disagrees authority could have more open platforms for people to contribute different ideas and opinions, and the wisdom of the whole society would lead to more reasonable strategy of the whole society, which creates more well-being for the overall people. Besides, if a resident can easily express his thoughts and sometimes have his or her thoughts being adapted by leaders, he would get a sense of achievement, which turns to well-being and motivates him or her to work harder and create more value. In this way we get a positive cycle which benefits everyone.
However, this phenomenon can easily make the society instable, thus resulting in severe consequences. It is worth noticing that there are some people within the society who have anti-society personalities, and they wish to turn a peaceful rally into a violence against the political system. If many people within the society are used by these anti-social people, they might simply ask no authority without knowing that actually they're making the society instable. An instable society has far more disadvantages than a society with socalled authority, because people can't even live peacefully, let alone well-being. People should know well that they are really questioning authority and they make no harm to the country before starting the action, but in reality it is hard to control their behavior.
To be honest, the society will be in its best condition if there is a reasonable portion of people who question authority. It would be the best if the government is accepting voices from public, and all public opinions get treated in time. In this way people's questions will not accumulate and result in the situation that the majority "question" the authority. In the same time, people's suggestions still contribute to the development of the society, and thus the overall well-being is increased. Therefore, this is the best case for the whole society.
In conclusion, considering the advantage of letting people's voices being heard by leaders, the phenomenon of the majority of people questioning authority seems beneficial for the social well-being. However, owing to the possible consequences this behavior would lead to, I am in the opinion that this would not enhance the social well-being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...perspective immature. Admittedly, we cant ignore the benefit of a society with su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...authority without knowing that actually theyre making the society instable. An instabl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...with socalled authority, because people cant even live peacefully, let alone well-be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2497.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26793248945 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9125823105 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491561181435 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7951592251 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.904761905 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262107541501 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790346827608 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548689238033 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150882379693 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310132326838 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.