While a single national curriculum serves to ensure that students are at least familiar with the basics of all subjects, it also prevents them from furthering their knowledge into specific fields of interest. The prompt questions whether it is beneficial for all students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that a singular national curriculum is required due to reasons such as diversity amidst people owing to regional, social and economic differences.
A nation's decision to develop a single national curriculum which serves best in the interest of the people should take into account the diversity present in its citizens. For example, in considering a single curriculum for History in India, in matters such as its struggle for independence, the curriculum must include freedom fighters from all across the country, thereby portraying the cooperation amidst them in reaching such a cherished accomplishment.
However, such an approach is not feasible for all subjects given the diversity of linguistics present in a country like India. For example, the people living in Bengal region of the country are more inclined towards studying Bengali literary works while a resident of Rajasthan would like to read more on Rajasthani poetry and prose. Hence, a single national curriculum in such subjects would prevent people from reading such regional languages and supplant them with a single national language and its literary works. This would inevitably be detrimental since it would serve to eradicate the proliferation of diverse regional languages and traditions that define the nation.
Indisputably, a single national curriculum would bring parity in the knowledge that its students have, but such parity might not lead to substantial improvement in the overall literacy of the people. In defining a sinle national curriculum, a country also needs to keep in mind the weakest sections of its population, people who have not been exposed to the education earlier due to economic or social conditions. While a strict educational curriculum will serve to benefit the more learned society, it would inevitably discourage the weaker sections to give up education at an early age. On the contrary, a single curriculum dedicated towards the weaker sections would not help advance knowledge of the more educated section of the people.
In conclusion, based on the above scenarios, a single national curriculum for all students will not serve to be in the best interests of the people. The inherent diversity in a country due to social, regional and economic differences often needs to be considered when such proposals of a singular unified approach is presented. These differences necessitate an approach which caters to individual needs while also making significant efforts towards upliftment of the society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...until they enter college. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that a singular nation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39293598234 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89686130625 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476821192053 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7350446369 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.6875 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3125 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229864813394 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901959731766 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755359609372 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148461097491 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751261984449 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.