The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this issue, the author claims that human mind is always going to remain superior to a machine as machine is in turn a human creation. I would disagree with this claim due to the following reasons.
Firstly, we should understand the main reason behind creation of machines. Machines are created by humans to make the human job easier, faster and convinient. And as mankind progresses, the jobs are getting smarter and smarter, and hence the machines that we are building for our convinience are also getting smarter and faster. Take for example a computer; 20 years ago no one would have dreamed that something as advanced as a computer would be carried by almost every human on the planet, simply in their pockets (smartphones). The job requirements for a person are also increasing day by day, because easier jobs are now done by machines.
There have been several instances where a machine has beat a human record holder in a particular activity. Recently, in the board game "GO", an artificial machine beat the top human "Go" player in a matter of minutes. It is safe to say that the "GO" player machine is superior to any human "GO" player on this planet. Robot "Sophia" has also been granted US citizenship. Human mind is viewed superior only because it is the cause for building a certain machine. However, there are also few machines which are capable of generating new machines. Now this is what challenges the author's statement. If such machines become popular, there would be no real challange for a machine mind.
However, we are far from the era when machine mind will be as powerful as human mind. Although machines are becoming smarter, they are really just able to beat humans in a particular task. An all powerful machine is still a dream far from reality. But someday, this dream might turn into a prosperous reality or a nightmare for mankind.
Hence, I disagree with the author's claim, as there have been instances where humans have been beated by machines. Although an all powerful machine has not yet been developed, it soon might be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar activity. Recently, in the board game 'GO', an artificial machine be...
^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...chines. Now this is what challenges the authors statement. If such machines become popu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, really, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93539325843 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7954321746 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9332967324 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9523809524 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286156915771 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946821917301 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738018923171 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167243304368 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466074180863 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.