Surely, there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals that, significance of goals in the growth of an individual and overall development of society has always been one of the prominent topic in contemporary discussions. However, it’s presumptuous to suggest that all the measures taken to attain a goal is conducive. Therefore, even though attaining a goal would help you to receive some superior vantage, but there is no assurance that the consequence would be beneficial.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons to support the claim of author which might appear to have some considerable merits. After all, a goal is difficult to be attained if the available measures are scarce. Yet the speaker fails to provide a clear litmus test for the measuring measures. When we speak about the “measures taken in a pursuit of goal” following comes to our mind: a country trying to be affluent by doing violent action to the neighboring countries, a business man making a fraud of brobdingnagian amount of money in order to achieve the certain heights of their company. In a way, if we come across a person who has this great ambition to become a president of a country and in order to achieve that goal he’s planning for a massacre than that would not be justifiable. Hence, in order to determine the prerequisities of using any measure to achieve a goal it is necessary to determine the consequences caused by the measures.
It is thus justifiable to take both positive and negative consequences into account, then we will find the statement problematic. People need to understand certain morale before taking steps to achieve any kind of goal. Consider it, if the goal of some students is to study in one of the 12 Ivy League Universities around the world then he have to study day and night in order to achieve his goals without any concern of outer what people would think, then it can be excusable. On contrary, if some of other students goes beyond any extent to achieve that goal by making fake documents or by cheating then it will create lot of negative impact on the students who’re actually studying. Therefore, we can’t be blind about the fact that to achieve goal by any measures has some major consequences would probably degrade the overall betterment of society.
We can find many people in the society who are very woke and penchant for the development of society in a modern way by using the raw and pure woods from the forest. While, we talk about creating a modern society with our natural flora and fauna then we forget to think about the biological degradation and global warming it would cause because of the deforestation and imbalance in the ecosystem. So, we have to acknowledge this that when think about the goal that is worthy we can’t surely ignore the major problems it might cause for the future generation.
Based on the arguments above, I’d stress that the downsides of the topic are too baffling to ignore. Although, it sometimes seems that if a goal is worthy than any means are justifiable but not all goals are same. However, it’s deleterious effect should be well handed or else no matter what the goal is if we go beyond and above then it might backfire at some moment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...e Universities around the world then he have to study day and night in order to achi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its deleterious effect'?
Suggestion: its deleterious effect
...le but not all goals are same. However, it’s deleterious effect should be well handed or else no matter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, after all, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76388888889 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71601252847 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2215181215 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195452576365 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584870715417 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393031113684 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101349779703 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239447031366 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.