The given argument indicates that even the Prunty County should implement similar rule as Butler countyin order to improve their highway safety.The author came to this conclusion based on the issues faced by the Prunty county cause the new law implemented exacerbated the situation rather than alleviating them. However, before this recommendation can be properly evaluated, there are certain things that need to be addressed and explained.
First of all, in order to make any law to be successfully implemented there should equal support from the people as well. Perhaps the people driving in the Prunty highway area are feckless which might have cause the situation to worsen. For example, if the people of prunty highway are given knowledge about the road safety there might be a chance of people following them because practical education quite often open's people eyes for many things. If the either of the point has any merit than the argument offered by the author is weakned.
Secondly, may be the roads of the prunty highway are smaller in comparision to the Butler highway so there would be probably no chnace of increasing the road width and resurfacing the highways. In a way, even if government might pass teh budget for the road improvement but there is no space to bolster the road then it will all be absurd. If the above is true, than the original argument doesn't hold any wtaer.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to it's reliance on the premature assumptions.I f the author is able to clarify the above quandaries with the more germane evidence than the proposed recommendation can be viable which states the prunty highway needs to follow the rules implemented by butler highway to improve road safety.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 12 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 298 350
No. of Characters: 1443 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.155 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.842 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.581 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.148 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.396 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.396 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...n order to improve their highway safety.The author came to this conclusion based on...
^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...ll all be absurd. If the above is true, than the original argument doesnt hold any w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ove is true, than the original argument doesnt hold any wtaer. In conclusion, the arg...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...s reliance on the premature assumptions.I f the author is able to clarify the abo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 295.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97966101695 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65375452891 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0162622832 57.8364921388 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.9 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 23.324526521 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.70786347227 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183421563007 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688761826103 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560399451386 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119025292325 0.128457276422 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252236462278 0.0628817314937 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.