In today’s world, some people make more money due to the well paid job or their inherit fortune while others struggle to even fulfill the basic needs of their life. Money has always been one of the prominent topic in the contemporary discussions. Despite, the fact that rich people can spend their money in whichever way they want I truly believe that if they allocate the money then it will bring lot of positive changes in the environment. In what follows I will elaborate my point.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons how wealthy people can change the life of not only one people but the whole society. Nowadays, many scholars have realized that poverty is one of the pivotal reasons for the crimes like kidnapping, stealing food happening in our society. This would cause adverse effect on the life of wealthy people as well. In a way, if wealthy people give charities to certain organization then they can easily eradicate these problems from society. So, I believe that wealthy people has this invisible power to uplift the society.
Likewise, by allocating the money on good deeds billionaires would be more recognized and celebrated. As, we all know the media would highlight the generosity done by them even it is for their own selfish reasons. For instance, a billionaire has opened a hospital in my locality where he provides free medical services for the people who can’t afford treatment. This has bought lot of media coverage, approbation and fame for him. Most of the citizen know him and talk about him as their role model for children.
Nevertheless, sometimes people get used to the charitable money. Even though they donate money with their own accord. It would make some people would be indolent and reluctant to go work. However, we can’t ignore the fact that most people are living without proper food and basic education.
In conclusion, I certainly believe that donating a part of your income could bring commendable changes in the society and take advantage by gaining respect and fame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eople get used to the charitable money. Even though they donate money with their own accord...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90697674419 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52249881475 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584302325581 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5741653681 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8421052632 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839992574497 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275045136822 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341834778113 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0428540711357 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352790960019 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.