Human beings and the behaviours they depict purely depends upon the reaction to action, external and internal factors and sometimes their upbringing as well. We all are wary about the fact that nature of human beings are very mercurial at times.So, it would be very erroneous to claim that human beings behaviour solely depends upon the forces and not of their own making.
Despite the circumstances, that occurs in different phases of life human beings tend to react according to the situation. In other words, if you are having minor inconvenience or befuddlement about certain situation then you would react calmly in comparision to the situation which makes you uncomfortable at it's core. For example, people's reaction or behaviour when dealing with public denunciation and severe censure would come quite outrageous than dealing with the situation when you're getting constructive criticism from your family and friends.
Most of the time, you're not obliged to give your reaction to certain situation, however you would put forward your opinion is because of your own individuality. This is one of the pivotal reason for dispute, which is caused due to lack of cognizance about when to speak and how to react. For instance, if you are being nosy in between the discussion between two friends and putting forward your unsolicited opinion then, it would definitely show your character, as here you were not forced with any external forces.
Moreover, sometimes upbringing plays a vital role in one's behaviour. Children who are born and brought up in a disturbing house would have always have dysfunctional mentality as compared to the one's who grew up in a healthy family. In a way, they would actually find domestic violence very normal and are very reactive in every situation.
To rebuttal, I completely discord with the statement that states people's behaviour is hugely determined by forces not of their own making because sometimes people would react and give their recommendation and advice even when it is not required. On top of that, human beings are build in a way where you are supposed to act differently according to the time and situation that would come along your way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...uman beings are very mercurial at times.So, it would be very erroneous to claim th...
^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...d be very erroneous to claim that human beings behaviour solely depends upon the force...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...us than dealing with the situation when youre getting constructive criticism from you...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
... family and friends. Most of the time, youre not obliged to give your reaction to ce...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...etimes upbringing plays a vital role in ones behaviour. Children who are born and br...
^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...in a disturbing house would have always have dysfunctional mentality as compared to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06925207756 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71254367747 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542936288089 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4579163955 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.769230769 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247815996329 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829173865599 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785197462518 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137049333524 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983010893565 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.