The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
The recent trend in society is to speed up the process of achieving goals and obtain the same results, in a quicker time. However, doing so might lead to creating more problems than solving the existing ones. The prompt wishes to address this dilemma, I mostly agree with the prompt for two main reasons, however, I do concede that in select cases, rapidity is undeniably essential.
First of all, increasing the swiftness of a process usually tends to cut corners by a substantial amount. Because cutting corners in a critical workflow increases the risks of failure, these corner cuttings, in the future will inevitably cause more problems. For example, Samsung rushed to create a new flagship model in 2018, a few months after the product was launched, it gained a lot of media attention when it exploded during continuous usage while charging. The reason for exploding as stated in many well-known tech blogs and articles was because of the incapability of a resistor to handle the current load. Companies need to understand that increasing the rapidity of the process might not always lead to fruitful outcomes and must understand the risk of failure involved in it.
Secondly, when something is rushed, the favourable outcome might be accompanied by an unfavourable outcome as well. For example, Industrial effluents being released into water bodies has been a widely debated topic. Companies focus more on the main product than giving importance to the co-products the process has generated. These co-products are often useless and usually detrimental. To ensure rapid production, companies focus on increasing production rates but neglect the harmful effects of the co-products being produced. This is also one of the negative impacts of rapid nature in an industrial environment.
However, I do concede, that the rapid pace of a certain task is essential in some cases. For example, a manufacturing process called rapid prototyping ensures that a product can be built roughly and quite accurately using a different material, to check its performance in the real world. This process sheds time in manufacturing and implementing design changes in the product itself. It can be inferred that rapid prototyping is a very crucial phase of product development. Therefore, I reinstate my idea that In a select few cases, rapidity is very essential and must be followed.
In conclusion, I do agree that the rapid pace of life causes more problems than it solves, but I do concede that in some cases rapid nature of the process must be followed to obtain the required outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is very essential and must be followed. In conclusion, I do agree that the rapid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14928909953 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83471062562 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537914691943 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5432427067 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.65 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241801595906 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066107956291 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822421027367 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146829056429 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929192190479 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.