Issue3:Scandal are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The speaker asserts that scandals are more useful than reformers since scandals can focus our attention on problems, but reformers cannot. I fundamentally disagree with the speaker. Although scandals are useful in the political area, they have no positive effect in the long term, or on the economic area.
Admittedly, in political areas scandals are useful to improve management. If there are no scandals, governments receive no penalty. Through scandals, people can make leaders of the country pressed to enhance the performance of management. An effective scandal forced the government to reflect, leading them to change their policies and create more benefits for the public. Even if the governments have supreme power in the country, they cannot ignore people’s force. The Watergates scandal, a major political scandal in the United States, is a good example, which finally leads the U.S supreme court to make a series of reformations to guarantee the security of the country. In a words, scandal is an effective means because it attracts public attention, which makes government reforming.
However, in the long term scandal hurt society. if society overly depends on the scandal to inspect the government, which will let the government falling to keep its promise to people. When people distrust the government, society is in danger because the government cannot use any power to balance the society disturbing. As a result, implacable social problems will cause a series of threats to people. The overly dependent on scandal could not be an effective means, whereas reformer could make society progressing in the long term, which is unable for scandal. Reformers use their methods, such as culture reformatting and social reformatting, to improve society gradually, and to build cultural literacy. In short, the scandal could not be a useful method to improve society in the long term.
In the realm of the economy, scandal is also not useful. Even a series of big scandals appear every day, society has no improvement from the economic angle. It is needed to reckon what is the main problems, but not use the scandal to threaten the government overly. The economic improvement is not relative to scandal but is associated with the country’s development. Whether scandals are more or less, it is not pertinent to the economic increasing. However, Reformers could practically reform the country’s development, boosting the national economy through economic reformatting. Without reformers, the country’s economy is hard to improve because of lacking reformation that facilitates country development. In sum, scandal is not a useful means to improve society from an aspect of the economy.
In sum, although scandals have some merits in the political realm, they have no positive effect on the economic area, even having a negative impact in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the long term, or on the economic area. Admittedly, in politics scandals are use...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'scandal'?
Suggestion: scandal
...performance of management. An effective scandals can force government introspection, lea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...good example, which finally leads the U.S supreme court to make a series of refor...
^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a word' or simply 'words'?
Suggestion: a word; words
...arantee the security of the country. In a words, scandal is an effective means because ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...al have negative effect on the society. if society overly depends on the scandal t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, whereas, in short, such as, as a result, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34065934066 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85693659441 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5771592781 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4615384615 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220534924698 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713962007152 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479203088708 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142715609005 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069959756584 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.