The authors asserts that scandals can be used as a medium to spread awareness for an important issue of society and claims that this method is better than any speech or reformation act. I agree with the view expressed by the author.
It is often said that 'don't judge a book by it's cover' but the sad truth is people do judge it. A leaflet with colorful drawing with vibrant colors is being bought more that a plain black and white piece of paper with facts written in a passive tone.
For any information, it is important to reach maximum ears in order to get more attention. Scandals spread around faster than information, while very few read the piece of information - almost everyone is interested to hear about a scandal. For a fact, the statement of exclamations or dramatic wordings catch more eyes in comparison to plain facts. The history of human kind is filled with such scandals. Many symbolic historical breakthrough events where a resulted due to a series of outrageous wrongdoings coming out in a form of ice breaking scandals. Speech and reformations have their own symbolic importance in social awareness as one can not simply rely on scandals alone to raise awareness but such revealing surprises could keep those in power on their toes. When a mob of people get angered it can take down rulers with realms longer than decades. History is filled with such narratives.
While a scandal travels around like Chinese whisper many words of fallacy are added to it. It could be considered as a disadvantage but in a way the important essence of the situation is letting people know about the wrongdoings pertaining into the society rather than concentrating on irrelevant accuracy of a scandal. A scandal single handedly could expose an entire organization or government. Talking about human behavior, corrupt people would tend to restrain themselves if there is possibility of mass opposition, bringing years of humiliation and dishonor.
In a nutshell the possibility of a scandals could cause uproar and act as a breaking point for people atrocities are far more than compared to speech. Though with its negative impacts, scandals are acting positively for our society since eras.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'assert'.
Suggestion: assert
The authors asserts that scandals can be used as a medium t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... by the author. It is often said that dont judge a book by its cover but the sad t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun read seems to be countable; consider using: 'few reads'.
Suggestion: few reads
...und faster than information, while very few read the piece of information - almost every...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaking scandals. Speech and reformations have their own symbolic importance in so...
^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould keep those in power on their toes. When a mob of people get angered it can take...
^^^^
Line 3, column 901, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...History is filled with such narratives. While a scandal travels around like Chinese w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scandal' or simply 'scandals'?
Suggestion: a scandal; scandals
...nor. In a nutshell the possibility of a scandals could cause uproar and act as a breakin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in fact, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9593495935 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77126547714 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2922191638 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11850019734 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388054594628 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311404726854 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723210535626 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231159500008 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'assert'.
Suggestion: assert
The authors asserts that scandals can be used as a medium t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... by the author. It is often said that dont judge a book by its cover but the sad t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun read seems to be countable; consider using: 'few reads'.
Suggestion: few reads
...und faster than information, while very few read the piece of information - almost every...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaking scandals. Speech and reformations have their own symbolic importance in so...
^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould keep those in power on their toes. When a mob of people get angered it can take...
^^^^
Line 3, column 901, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...History is filled with such narratives. While a scandal travels around like Chinese w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scandal' or simply 'scandals'?
Suggestion: a scandal; scandals
...nor. In a nutshell the possibility of a scandals could cause uproar and act as a breakin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in fact, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9593495935 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77126547714 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2922191638 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11850019734 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388054594628 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311404726854 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723210535626 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231159500008 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.