IT IS DANGEROUS TO TRUST ONLY INTELLIGENCE
We are living in a competitive world, where there are limited opportunities and unlimited candidates. In order to stand out one must have certain properties, most important is intelligence. Intelligence is what makes people survive in this competitive world. But along with this one must possess qualities like hard word, moral thinking, team work etc. So relying only on intelligence will not help one to succeed, in fact in some cases it might bring out destruction.
Let us take an example of great scientist Elbert Einstein, who is considered as one of the most intelligent people till date and his convoluted structure of brain proves that. We all know that Einstein had given a great contribution to physical sciences and even other subjects. But was it only his intelligence which made him to be such a successful scientist? The answer is no, there are other qualities such as his hard work, persistence, optimistic attitude all these factors count as much as intelligence. If Einstein would not have worked hard persistently then we might not have got some equations like E=mc^2 which is very useful today.
Intelligence without proper moral attitude can sometimes be destructive to mankind. The terrorists are extremely intelligent human beings but due to lack of proper attitude and immoral behavior they use their intelligence producing atom bombs and other destructive instruments for the complete destruction of certain society. Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks are perfect example of this. The attack on USA’s world trade center, what an intelligent mind behind that. If one would have used such technologies for the betterment of mankind, the world would have been a different place to live.
Now let us consider a person with average intelligence, but along with this he is very dedicated towards work, extremely optimistic and persistence. And consider another person, who is very intelligent than previous one, but lazy, pessimistic. Who would you prefer to work for you company, obviously the 1st one. Because even though the 1st person is not as intelligent as 2nd person , he has other qualities which make him more efficient than 2nd person. So, even a person with average intelligence can perform better than the person who is extremely intelligent provided he has other qualities.
Finally, I would say that though intelligence is very important in today’s life, but relying only on intelligence might be dangerous. Intelligence should always be accompanied with qualities such as hard work, optimisms, moral behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... factors count as much as intelligence. If Einstein would not have worked hard per...
^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had used'?
Suggestion: had used
...an intelligent mind behind that. If one would have used such technologies for the betterment of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rson is not as intelligent as 2nd person , he has other qualities which make him m...
^^
Line 8, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hard work, optimisms, moral behaviour.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in fact, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2972972973 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98504860705 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535626535627 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9629947898 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68181818182 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17613696299 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600284443068 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660283195396 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116171202029 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046112232481 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.