It is no longer for a society to regard a man or a woman as a hero.
The notion about whether it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero could be weighed in many aspects. However, hero could be more than before if we consider media and the advance of technology.
Admittedly, the thriving media is exposing celebrities’ personal lives in front of the public. We can see famous people drink and eat like ordinary creatures. Those who looked sacrosanct people are less special when the public found they are as normal as we are. Yet the justice reaction from a normal person just like all of us still could be seen as a hero. There are many cases when people were suffered and somebody rescued them without asked any payment. It is the ordinary creates the hero.
Moreover, fewer people can find the difference about the heroes in the past since the distance was far then between the heroes and other people. However, we can watch much scientific research and analysis news about the heroes through media. Take Michael Jordan for example. He was known for his achievements on basketball which makes him a hero. The exacting training had been exposed by the media and its toughness made it unbelievable. Though he passed, people already treated him as a hero when he alive. Without sufficient report, he may not so famous if he was lived in the old times. Media do help the heroes’ born.
Finally, media tend to build heroes as the public’s need. Benefits and huge revenue are under the TV’s commercials. People love to see sensational news, shocking accidents and idols’ interviews. The more heroes, the more elements the media could sell and broadcast. With the power of the media, it is possible that there will be more heroes whether the society regard or the media create.
In sum, the media is willing to build heroes and the society is also seeking for it. More living people can be regard as heroes than before and might be even more in the future.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer63
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much scientific research', 'a good deal of scientific research'.
Suggestion: much scientific research; a good deal of scientific research
...and other people. However, we can watch many scientific research and analysis news about the heroes thro...
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'sell'
...roes, the more elements the media could sold and broadcast. With the power of the me...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77104377104 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39707466818 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602693602694 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.683422514 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.4761904762 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 23.4991977007 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170778990827 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055941908486 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587947234046 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117331944699 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573187407415 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
automated_readability_index: 8.1 14.1392134831 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.