Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Should we ban the advertising which brings to young children? I think this action can be too dramatic and unrealistic. Children are too naive to distinguish the truth of the advertising while they do not have the ability to purchase products also. Moreover, young children may recognize the advertising as an animation or TV show which is harmless. Lastly, TV channel made for young children rely on the advertising which is hard to separate them.
People may worry about the immature children cannot dispense the advertising. This is possible. Nevertheless, even they do believe cannot make them to purchase the products without their parents' money. Parents have the responsibility to teach their children what is true and it is a natural process of growing up.
Young children are very innocent and can hardly realize they are watching advertising since advertising produced for them can be really simple but not clear enough to express its meaning. Teaching young children is difficult. For example, my three-year-old cousin is still learning language and cannot understand my sentences or even single words. Advertising can stimulate his language ability is possible which can be allowed.
As I see, the advertising aims for young children are very rare and there is no need to limit the TV advertising. Advertising for young children usually appears between the cartoons or animations. Without those advertising buyers, the children TV channel can suffer a great loss on their revenue. Rejecting advertising for young children is also forcing children's TV channel to shut down.
The ability to segregate promotions and facts can be learned through advertising. Young children can learn words from advertising with its easy structure. The cartoon TV channels are depend on the advertising to survive which cannot be removed. It is unnecessary to ban advertising for young children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...t have the ability to purchase products also. Moreover, young children may recognize...
^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...g children is also forcing childrens TV channel to shut down. The ability to segrega...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... structure. The cartoon TV channels are depend on the advertising to survive which can...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90722471707 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6718991342 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1904761905 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2857142857 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192552311204 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768738976684 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046584695593 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126196433107 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457203129313 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.