It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker asserts that the way to define ourselves is through our identification with social groups. Social groups are indeed so different that people cannot identify them easily. However, people must identify social groups to define themselves. Therefore, Identification with social groups is the only way that can help people realize themselves. I strongly agree with the speaker.
To begin with, since human being lives in the social context, social identification, which can help us recognize ourselves, is necessary; As a social animal, humans have a relationship with his or her social partners, such as a colleague, classmate, and family. In different social groups, humans have different roles in the social context. To find their direction in life, humans must know what kinds of roles they play in society. For example, students must find out the requirement, and develop themselves through education. After graduating, students can engage in what they like or what they want to do, such as being a lawyer, an engineer, or a doctor. Without social identification, humans cannot realize who they are.
Further, defining the self through identification with social groups exercises a positive influence on humans. Humans will benefit from identifying characteristics of social groups, through which they can understand themselves better. For example, Clubs can be a small social groups; When attending schools, students search for a club. At clubs, the same kinds of students will be combined, and students can find out their merits in the clubs. In the clubs, students could be a director, a member belonging to event planning, or a member belonging to the public relations department. Through identifying their roles in the club, students can know what kind of roles they like, and it can be an analogy to society. In sum, humans can benefit from identifying their social groups.
On the other hand, the things that people could not identify social groups have a negative effect on them. If people are incapable of knowing their roles in society, they will lose their way, even unfamiliar with themselves. For instance, Lobo Wolf Girl, a girl was seen running on all fours alongside a pack of wolves going after a herd of goats. Due to lacking the ability to identify herself in the social context, she was unable to exhibit human characteristics. In brief, If people cannot identify social groups, they cannot behave like a human because they cannot define themselves.
To sum up, human realize themselves through identification with social groups and benefit from social groups. If people cannot recognize social groups, they will lose the direction in life. So, I totally agree with what the speaker says.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'group'?
Suggestion: group
...or example, Clubs can be a small social groups; When attending schools, students searc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in brief, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23006833713 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77776213047 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441913439636 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9363953169 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3076923077 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8846153846 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185355236276 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719409582152 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663018995454 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134405921972 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542898413549 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.