Social groups are a defined as groups of two or more people who share similar charecteristics, interact with each other and have sense of unity among them. The prompt here proposes that individuals affiliate themselves with social groups in order to establish their identity. Undoubtedly, the thought is justified for the reaoning that is provided as bleow.
To begin with, a child introduces himself with his family name, the level of education he has and which school he attends. Family being the first social group in which a child is born in and school being the secondary social group which a child attends and spends most time after home at during his childhood. Growing up he would introduce himself formally as a student of an institute or as an employee of a firm. Social groups are importnat in this way to introduce ourselves as this establishes trust with the person to whom we are introducing ourselves. If a person was to introduce himself just with his name, it becomes quite uncomfortable to accept him and even harder to trust him. Moreover, we are more inclined to do away with him ratehr than extend conversation with him. On the other hand, if a person introduces himself with his name followed by his profession, and nationality we are more likely to continue a conversation with him.
Secondly, humans are a social animal and feel better when they are able to associate themselves different social groups. Naturally, when humans meet other humans they introduce themselves with these associations, depending on the level of similar associations humans may or may not choose to form bonding with ech other. It is quite noticeable that people of similar profession bond quickly while people from different profession are not inclined to bond as quickly.For instance, say a doctor meets another doctor, or an engineer meets another engineer they are quickly able to get together whereas say a doctor was to meet an engineer or may be a businessman the two might not bond as closely as two doctors would. It can also be said that introduction with association to social group is an attestment of having shared or different experiences.
The opponents of the prompt however claim that human beings are unique and express themselves uniquely with their unique charecteristics. This view however fails to hold into account that charecteristcis are not the starting point of how a person introduces himself. The starting point of an introduction is what my name is and who idetify as. My charecteristics, which esentially are just a reflection of my level of involvement with my social groups, are brought up when a common issue comes up or when someone enquires. Hence, this view fails to hold ground and is rejected.
In conclusion, we can say that association with social gripus is key to expressing our identities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are a social animal and feel better when they are able to associate themselves di...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different social groups. Naturally, when humans meet other humans they introduce ...
^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ion are not inclined to bond as quickly.For instance, say a doctor meets another do...
^^^
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... social group is an attestment of having shared or different experiences. The ...
^^
Line 7, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th my social groups, are brought up when a common issue comes up or when someone...
^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up when a common issue comes up or when someone enquires. Hence, this view fails...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89030014065 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471578947368 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.687043902 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203420059314 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691450341766 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042725840829 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119732230324 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412540633204 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.