It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Human beings are always living in the various social groups in every stage of our lives. The social groups are like a mirror which reflects all the light that we beam. We cannot imagine a world in which we have no connection with other people at all. All the characteristics we developed are just aiming at adpat ourselves to the world. Generally we define ourselves through our identification with social groups, I agree with the viewpoint. In addition, this identification is not always the positive. I will illustrate the reason why I agree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, from the birth we bagan to get in touch with the social groups made up with our family members. As we were still unconscious about the objective world, all the things that we knew about "me" was just physical feeling. When we felt hungry we needed to eat, and when sleepy mother would make us sleep. Through this kind of primary identification we built the initial cognition about the world. With age, we started to know more about the most beautiful thing in the world, it is "self". We got to know what was I like or dislike. Through living in social groups other than our family we learned to interact with other peers and further developed more hobbies which gave us opportunity to build our social skills and get involved in the bigger world. Then, our life truly began.
In our childhood we made lots of friends and developed our diverse personalities, We learned to love and care about other people. When reaching the adulthood, we have already accumulated enough experiences and knowledge to make the essential decisions for our life and take the related responsibility. The interaction between us and the social groups never stops. The social is like the biggest social groups which includes every smaller groups. Because of the identical hobbies, we know more samilar people, with whom we could share the same happiness and get the positive reflection. Then it just strengthens the our self-identification and we know ourselves better. I got to know that I have talent in basketball and I enjoy playing basketball on the court with these guys. Huge amount of this kind of reflection helps us explore ourselves better.
However, in this process the reflection is not always positive. The failures also made us clearer about the objective world. However, the social group doesn't play a unique role in our defining journey. We are the driver of the journey and keep being aware of where we are. In these processes we also got to know, we cannot find a social group in which people can perfectly match me. Every individual is unique in the world. Thus, we studied to choose the groups and how we act in this group. I mean, we only show our specific sides to them and actually we are highly aware about it.
The whole life journey is a trip where we keep beaming our light to the social groups and get related reflection. Even if sometimes we feel exhausted and want to escape, it is still the consequence that we are influenced by the social groups. Thus, I agree with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...ve reflection. Then it just strengthens the our self-identification and we know ourselv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ective world. However, the social group doesnt play a unique role in our defining jour...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, thus, i mean, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 33.0505617978 242% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8105065666 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69782661229 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457786116323 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3750950992 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4117647059 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6764705882 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507485017789 0.243740707755 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140740492715 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109539410732 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337322208132 0.150359130593 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710387325812 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.