It’s not possible for someone to effectively care for others unless they are taking good care of themselves.
A person who cares for someone is truly a blessing to have around. With the tireless and selfless efforts, one indulge themselves in such noble activity. Here, the claim is made it's not possible for someone to effectively care for others unless they are taking good care of themselves and I mostly agree with this assertion. It is the first and foremost priority to take care of oneself so that one can take care of others.
Firstly, a person in tempestuousness and state of chaos can't take care of others in efficacious manner. Even if the efforts are made to take care of others in such state of mind, it is certain that it would go in vain and won't be efficacious. Furthermore, in current scenario, where the issues of mental health has been emerging issue pervaded throughout the world, it is the utmost priority to take care of oneself to take good care of other people. Based on this idea, In Australia, Greenwood Old-age Home conducts weekly health assessment of their health workers to ensure the physical and mental well being of their workers so that they could take proper care of the senile people in the old-age home.
Secondly, on a broader picture, we can see a country with an instability of government can't address the issues of its citizen and often doesn't seem to step up to provide the aid during the global crisis too. There are many pertinent examples in the history itself and the economic crisis resulted by the same. The major downfall of Japan's economy after the Second World War took decades to recover. The political chaos in Nepal after the fall of Monarchy has impeded many of the development activities. Therefore, it should be the motto of everyone to take care of themselves first so that they could take care of others. If we see the numbers and figures of the donation received in the United Nations, the countries who are prosperous are often the leading doners in the leaderboard. This also suggests that they can give a helping hand because they are satiate and complacent. The most germane example is that Would you donate a money, albeit petty amount to needy you see outside your door when you are in the recession and money crisis? It explains itself.
However, there might be few examples where one has been taking care of others despite oneself being in jeopardy. The Bhutanese Refugee were under the hood of Government of Nepal and India for several years. Later when the economy of the respective nations began to feel the burden of those refugees they were sent back to Bhutan by involvement of various retinues, emissaries, and diplomats between the respective nations. Thus, it suggests that one can't provide proper care if itself is in jeopardy.
Lastly, from the various examples mention aboveboard it is evident that one can't take care of others if itself isn't in the state of well being and prosperous. It would be better if everyone start taking care of themselves so that they could be a go-to person when someone is in need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-22 | Abhishek Poudel | 54 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 60 | view |
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 3
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 73
- TOEFL T P O 2 Integrated Writing Task 37
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n in tempestuousness and state of chaos cant take care of others in efficacious mann...
^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...untry with an instability of government cant address the issues of its citizen and o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ess the issues of its citizen and often doesnt seem to step up to provide the aid duri...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ive nations. Thus, it suggests that one cant provide proper care if itself is in jeo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ntion aboveboard it is evident that one cant take care of others if itself isnt in t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... one cant take care of others if itself isnt in the state of well being and prospero...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-to person when someone is in need.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74521072797 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46714810593 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473180076628 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5302676916 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.695652174 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6956521739 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458060552195 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12567582774 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15340921463 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274711809379 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180607215147 0.0667264976115 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.