Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The statement contends that bringing justice should interchangeable with conditions, periods and locations. When the convicted moved its time and space into different status, the law should be consider those changed situation. However, it is difficult to agree the statement because if the law varies because of situations, times and places, it will harming the law itself which should be rigid as the protector of the justice. There could be some exceptions on some specific situation, but it does not mean laws should be flexible.
Laws should be stubborn and rigid because it is basis of credibility toward society. As citizens circumscribe their own rights and do the duty which is given from the society, they are expecting the society would not go to chaos and sustain with power. If the society want to show its citizens that oneself is reliable, it should show that the society is well structured and have adequate security, preventing anything which will disturb the citizens’ well-being. To do it, the society should prove that their bases of those well-being which are laws are unchangeable and they will be stand still. If the law itself is shaky and unstable, the citizens would not show their credit to their society.
The proponents of the statement would refute there are several situations that the law should be flexible. Without considering the backgrounds and sentencing only from the result, the world would be lack of humanism and become such a cruel world. If the normal businessman and the beggar who lost one’s job years ago and was starving each steals a single bread and each get a same verdict, it would be unfair because the beggar would be more critical to the verdict despite of same crime.
It is true that there are several cases which make one’s heart so cold and melancholy. In those cases, it would be a better to decrease the beggar’s fine considering the background and encourage the beggar to have a job. However, these exceptional examples does not mean that the flexibility of laws should be allowed. These are possible on relatively trivial cases, when there are no bad influence or even giving better result to individual by mitigating the verdict. If the cases become enormous and depressing, the law should be as inflexible as possible. If the CEO of the company tricked numerous people giving huge damage, no matter what reason, even if it was for the enhancement of the nation overall, it should be punished heavily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...nto different status, the law should be consider those changed situation. However, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
...f situations, times and places, it will harming the law itself which should be rigid as...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this well-being' or ''?
Suggestion: this well-being;
...ociety should prove that their bases of those well-being which are laws are unchangeable and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, well, as for, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9734939759 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65072726979 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498795180723 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7593342026 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94444444444 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253447262809 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974999652244 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076430461694 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163774818311 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614512933098 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.