Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Laws and rules are framed by a country so as to impose a form of decency and goodwill among it's citizens. Breaking a law or commuting a crime can lead to a punishment based on the various facts that support the crime. Laws should be flexible enough to take into account, various circumstances, times and places. I disagree with such a statement since laws have been made so as to preserve the integrity of a nation. Bending them to suit our needs would lead to the true purpose of the laws getting lost into oblivion. The reasoning behind my position as well as the evidences to back my claim will be explained in the paragraphs below.
As explained in the earlier paragraph, modifying the laws according to various circumstances, times or places could lead to the acquittal of a true criminal. In today's world, defense lawyers bring about several situations and personas to justify that their client has done nothing wrong. Their sole purpose is to find a way to undo the laws so that they can mold them according to their needs. This is not what a citizen of a nation would want. Such flexibility would ultimately lead to the acquittal of every guilty individual on the grounds of circumstances, times and places. No individual wants to walk down a road in the fear that the person approaching him could be a murderer. Laws have been made to lock such morbid individuals behind bars and therefore concession on the grounds of circumstance, time or place should be forbidden.
Moreover, the laws that are in place take into consideration, the necessary circumstances, times or places. For example, in a possible case of murder, the accused is deemed of commuting a first degree murder, second degree murder or manslaughter. All of these offences take into account the intent and the circumstance behind such a crime. On top of that, the punishment for a crime is decided after thorough deliberation between the lawyers of both sides and the judge himself. Thus, further flexibility with respect to the laws, in my opinion is not deemed to be necessary.
Proponents of the above statement would claim that instances such as murder are sometimes committed as a result of misunderstanding or due to a mistake. Hence, laws should be flexible enough to acquit such individuals of crime. If the murder committed was actually an accident, and if there are evidences to back such a claim, then the person should be rest assured that he will be cleared of all charges against his name. On the contrary, if a person seems to have committed a sinful crime and the evidence back such an incident, even if it was a mistake, does not deserve a full pardon. Punishing the accused would rather serve as a reminder that sinful acts like a murder do not have any place in the society and one should refrain from indulging in such unlawful activities.
In sum, I still stand against the claim that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. If such a method of law is adopted, it would not take long before the nation will loose trust upon the laws that were actually put in place to protect them from miscreants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 92 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 79
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
Laws and rules are framed by a country so as to impose a form of decency and goodwill a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...h a statement since laws have been made so as to preserve the integrity of a nation. Ben...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rested'?
Suggestion: rested
...such a claim, then the person should be rest assured that he will be cleared of all ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 220, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ld not take long before the nation will loose trust upon the laws that were actually ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, with respect to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2610.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75409836066 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74554139496 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459016393443 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5946585472 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.4 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.96 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.12 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227571612352 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727574748757 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728448588081 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145637067279 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521125842474 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.