Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In our contemporary life, laws have irreplaceable role, since they affect demeanors and actions of people and increase safety of citizens. Prompt argue that laws ought to be lithe enough to applied for different situations, times and places. Personally, I belive that this approach has reasonable explanations, while some drawbacks. Therefore, I partly agree with this statement.
First of all, different conditions requires different perspective of judgement, thus, laws should take account of a variety of circumstances. Countries have discrepancies among geographic features, developments, sociodemographic characteristics of citizens, economic status and more. As a result of this, commited guilties cannot be evaluated equally. For example, if a murdery occurred in a rural area which did not bolstered with camera evidents, it is not comparable with another murdery occurred in a metropolitan town with camera record. Therefore, it is crucial to make laws practicle and flexible for different situations.
Secondly, unstoppable advancement in technology results with novel systems and products, which allow people to use them while they are commiting. However, if constitution neglect these improvements, it can cause unjudged guilts, whoch can decrease faith of society for laws. For instance, if someone use special eyeswear for cheating in national university entrance exam and he had not been arrested, but others were catched while they used papers. Since, in the constitution it is stated that papers should be punished, but there is no rules for special systems such as those eyeglasses. To conclude up, covering different conditions help justice provider be more effective.
However, lawyers tend to use gaps in constitutions in order to advocate guilty people; hence, making laws flexible can create problems when providing justice among all citizens. Because, a shrewd advocate can change situation of his clients according to laws to protect him from charge or reduce his punishment. It is important to mention that, these kinds of corruptions occur mostly in developing countries rather than developed countries with tranparent burocracthic systems. Thus, law makers should be aware of these possible explotions in order to reduce provide a fair system for society.
In conclsuion, I am of the opinion that laws should be flexible enough to cover different situations and be used for uncomparable times and places. This is because country consist discrepancies, which can change situations. Secondly, technology is developing every single day, and people can use novel systems for their guilts. As a result of this laws should take account a variety fo circumstances. Nevertheless, law makers should not ignore gaps in the laws to prevent deceit behaviors of lawyers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...iety for laws. For instance, if someone use special eyeswear for cheating in nation...
^^^
Line 4, column 525, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no rules'?
Suggestion: there are no rules
...ted that papers should be punished, but there is no rules for special systems such as those eyegl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can use novel systems for their guilts. As a result of this laws should take accou...
^^
Line 6, column 343, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ystems for their guilts. As a result of this laws should take account a variety fo c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58490566038 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07700144268 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577830188679 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9547536816 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.956521739 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221975075647 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654076479263 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045580774671 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132402572441 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481306335689 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.