Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position,
you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The contention that laws should be fluid enough to consider factors like time, places, etc; is not a trivial one. There are several nuances that need to be considered before taking account of various circumstances, times, and places. Nonetheless, it is imperative that laws should have the flexibility to take into consideration factors like different scenarios, locations, and times. Thus, I strongly agree with the claim for two reasons.
To begin with, laws should consider the freedom of the citizens. Some laws may thwart the movement of people and may silent the voice of people. Furthermore, people will suffocate in such environment and will revoke to demand their equality, freedom to speak, etc. For instance, if a law states that females should be indoors after past 6 pm and can't indulge in human contact with opposite sex for more than a minute will significantly affect females living in the nation physically and mentally. This law may have been imposed to reduce the rape cases registered over the years in the nation, but such law will break the heart and will of a female to live freely. If such scenario holds merit, then it is evident that laws should be flexible to
consider other important factors which may get affected negatively.
Furthermore, every law in the nation is made for the betterment of the citizens. Every law should consider all factors which may get affected or may arised if it is imposed, and must provide an exception or an alternate way for critical circumstances. For example, if government decided to impose the nigh curfew for a particular region to lessen the number of illegal activities, it must consider a situation where emergencies may happen. Suppose, if a person needs a medical emergency immediately, and his or her life is at stake, the government should not file charge as illegal action taken for such emergencies. Instead, it should provide an exception to such scenarios. From the above instance, it is obvious that law needs to be flexible enough for emergency situations.
In conclusion, laws should consider a wide-range of factors, and needs to be flexible enough for the betterment of the public. Some might argue that law is made to protect the citizens and hinder the people's actions who wants to hurt them, but isn't the primary role of law is to protect the citizens? So, for medical emergency situation people let their loved ones die because they might die outside?.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s should be indoors after past 6 pm and cant indulge in human contact with opposite ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evident that laws should be flexible to consider other important factors which m...
^^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...les actions who wants to hurt them, but isnt the primary role of law is to protect t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99511002445 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71508599192 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523227383863 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9808941662 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.526315789 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205472006505 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740455418529 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454822801745 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117979376836 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516080050547 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.