In theoretically, it is better to consider various circumstances, times, and places into one law. It is even the original intention of enacting the law for people. Laws use as a instrument to restraint people’s behavior that tells people what to do and what to not to do. If a law can contain various circumstances, times and places, it should be more convenience to enact and more perfect to implement.
However, in practically, there is not a law that should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places because people’s rationality and people’s ability of prediction for future and unknown is limited. It will produce unpleasant reasons if people have to contain many kinds of circumstances, times and places. The first unpleasant reason is that people have to deal with one thing using one rule instead of legislation. That would produce different kinds of legal cases while a complete legal system will never bring out, which should never utilize controlling people’s behavior perfect and people who brakes the law would find a way out. The second unpleasant reason is that more flexible law would forfeit its seriousness and authority. Meanwhile, it changes too fast to comply for people. In the ancient time in China, monarch means law and what he said will be a law for people. However, the flexible law, that looks much more like randomly law, is not what the federal society should have and expect.
To take account of various circumstances, times and places, there are some reasons to deal with. Firstly, what the law maintains and provokes is the social’s last value, such as freedom, democracy, equitable, justice and people’s life, property, human dignity doesn’t violent, that never change. So, maintaining these social basic values should be more and more stable. Secondly, how to make a law and how to enact a law must be equally, justice and open, of course, there procedures should be stable, too. If not, it will give some unlawful people to chit with laws even though the law is the best one. Thirdly, under the legal principles, people could utilize the Supreme Court of Justice or relevant jurisprudence to flexible deal with some special circumstances in reality. Fourth, the law is not panacea. People should give some spaces and chances to medias, public opinion, traditional convention and civil social organizations. These organizations can help social self-management and self-correction.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...nacting the law for people. Laws use as a instrument to restraint people's b...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22194513716 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00682366478 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491271820449 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8528270765 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412115356431 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119953275951 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127072838123 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307684409677 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303223864541 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.