What political leaders said should commit to public opinion, and what political leaders did should serve for public opinion. Thus, political leaders must do their best to satisfy what public demands, even though the public has some special conditions and it prevents nations’ development. Following what public opinion will make people happy and make an important promoting for hamoniary social.
As said in the first paragraph, political leaders work for public and they have a responsibility to embrace a bright future effectively. But it doesn’t mean political leaders must yield to public opinion because public opinion is always different. Thousand people have thousand opinions that political leaders cannot follow everyone in which maybe lead to a distrasor. For example, supposing there is a wilderness area in the city and someone consists to build a school and someone consists to build a park. So, what political leaders do will satisfy public and is effective for producing the city. Maybe somebody will say it is enough to be effective that political leaders only remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. However, political leaders have to yield to public opinion. With the development of social, some principles and objectives doesn’t apply anymore. If political leaders remain consistently committed to these things, social will never have a bright future and public would fight with political.
Additionally, neither yielding to public opinion nor remaining consistently committed to particular principles is not to be an effective leader. An effect leader is not the only key to embrace a light future for public. How to maintain a city work normally defends on many reasons. The first reason is the team’s collabrotion that induces the political work progress effectively and convienetly. If people in the team don’t collobrate with others, one thing would never be done. Second reason is communication between the leader and his team’s member. What if the team’s member never tells anything bad or emgercy thing to the leader, the leader is enclosed forever. A well communication is a way to hold the social’s development and the public opinion for an effective leader. The team’s vision comes third reason for an effective leader that implies the nation’s future.
An effective leader knows how to make a decisive and when to yield to public opinion. Meanwhile, the leaser’s team should be inspected any time to hold its energy. Adding new people or young people on the team timely and rigidly management is a way to be an effective leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Thousand'.
Suggestion: A Thousand
...use public opinion is always different. Thousand people have thousand opinions that poli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... always different. Thousand people have thousand opinions that political leaders cannot ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41787439614 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94799316928 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.4932671777 93% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.740449438202 540% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5311416117 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4583333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29166666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40377705578 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14941555506 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857149851466 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279765968982 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455775349922 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.