Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Law functions the skeleton constructing and restricting the legal acts of all individuals in a particular society, thus, this set of rules are of utmost essential to any society. However, it is implausible to expect this constitutional framework to be impeccable. To me, in this legal construct, there should be enough flexibility to adopt these legal acts according to diverse situations, unique locations and accustom timeframe.
In any legal framework, there exist mainly two spectrums, namely, civil and criminal laws. I abide that both civil and criminal law should be taken with some leeway. The infringement of civil acts, akin to illegal gambling, tax delay, traffic violation (not involving injuries or death), could be resolved with monetary penalties based on the severity of the offense. Crimes involving physical or mental abuse, on the contrary, are more likely result in permanent damage for not only the victims. Though criminal acts are indubitably perceived detrimental, they are not always occurred on will. We have to consider cases, for instance, a victim is coerced to kill just self-defense or a rapist might suffer from mental-illness which provokes him to carry out such grim behavior. Therefore, the law is supposed to measure all those contributing factors to cater a fair judgement.
I also agree that there should be more than just flexibility but a clear distinction of law in different places. Considering the State law and Federal law in the United States, these two set of constitutional divisions impact differently on the law-obedient, being, the citizens. We could further elaborate this point with an example of the traffic law in the United States, which was governed by independent States authority. The variation is mainly corresponding to the infrastructure. For instance, the driving speeds and instruction of California, due to the amount of vehicles and landmass, is set up distinctively from Texas. Another evident for the existence of such variation could be observed in the way that alcohol was legalized in public area in in the tourism hub- New Orleans but not in the trading zone- Los Angeles. In sum, legal ramification for each introduction of law should be measured according to the location.
Also, no set of law is possible to remain timeless. Thus, we should take into account of timing, when some rules prevail over others and should be adapt responsively. During times when terrorism is escalating, border protection becomes critical in almost all nations, where tighter visa process and security checkpoints have been set-up to fight against this global threat. The catch is that with such restricted enforcement, it would likely jeopardize the conviction and interest of visitors, resulting in diminishing tourism growth and global trading. Hence, government should consider ways to alleviate this jurisdiction during low-risk period such as low-season of the industry with the aim to encourage travelers and traders to remain active.
In conclusion, as I cogently elaborated above, legal framework should be built with certain latitude to be incorporated flexibly into various circumstances, times and places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...at alcohol was legalized in public area in in the tourism hub- New Orleans but not in...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapted'?
Suggestion: adapted
...rules prevail over others and should be adapt responsively. During times when terrori...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39156626506 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01871350875 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570281124498 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 844.2 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6388032654 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.739130435 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.652173913 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184695306195 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510109939201 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476858202107 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106676917529 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388657543403 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 100.480337079 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.