"Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places."
The statement contends that rather than being fixed, laws should be flexible enough to take circumstances, time and place into account. I concede that such flexible law would prove effective for certain cases however the bitter consequences for other cases would outweigh the benefits.
What is the source of law? A felt need is a source of law. The felt by everyone in society to feel safe and to be treated equal. If the law was made flexible, certain people of a race, gender, sexuality are bound to feel indignant if people of other race, gender or sexuality where not given the same punishment. Law is supposed to treat everyone equally be it an aristocrat or a mendicant and if that does not hold, people would feel cheated.
Some people could take advantage of flexible law to act on their prejudices, for example in America for the case of George Floyd where an unarmed black man was killed on the spot, if the law was flexible finding loopholes would be much easier and getting justice may have been delayed or even impossible. In general, the process of providing justice could be too complex and biased.
However, minor crimes like driving over speed limit when taking an ill person to the hospital could be excused taking the circumstances into account. As long as any other person is not harmed and the convicted person acted under helplessness, the law could be made flexible.
In sum, I believe that for crimes of higher order flexible law can prove to be biased and leave certain people feeling indignant. However, for certain minor crimes flexible law can prove to be effective and serve its purpose.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 280.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47735663932 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8541894752 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310964392612 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121821849742 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113562070617 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178509448392 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783762648373 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.