Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take
account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Law is a protocol that is used for restain the public and also used for security of the public. However, I agree with the author states, the law should not be fixed and flexible enough in various circumstance, times and places.
First of all, the law should not be preconceived or biased and there should no distinction between poor and rich. For example, a person murders become convicted. But, it can be possible that he did it at protection. Thus, his punishment should be looking at sympathy. He has to be all right to present his evidence. Otherwise many innocent people will be guilty. Another is, law has many loopholes which tend to use by the unethical people for their suitability. For example, many unethical people avoid tax of the business by this hole and make it legal. Thus law should be flexible but not weak.
Secondly, few era ago in many country had very brutal law which is not desirable. For instances, in Arab if a people was steal in past he was tortured be brutally. His hand might be cut down or by throwing stone he was punished. This type of crulality is not desirable. Thus, before punished it should confirm that the severity of the offence.
However, in some circumstance law should be more fixed. For example, in some country, the right of the women is so negligible that they are repressive by the men. Some of the girls gang rape by the men, and some of thrash by the husband for the dowery. In this country to stop this crime or protect the women law should be more stationary and need to show zero tolerance.
To conclude, every issue has pons and cons we must be careful regarding of such thing. Yet anyone tries to introduce better form of it there is always behind something it. Therefore, law should be more rigid when it relates to the security of the citien and always try to present a better form of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...o be all right to present his evidence. Otherwise many innocent people will be guilty. An...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...usiness by this hole and make it legal. Thus law should be flexible but not weak. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun country seems to be countable; consider using: 'many countries'.
Suggestion: many countries
...t not weak. Secondly, few era ago in many country had very brutal law which is not desira...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...le that they are repressive by the men. Some of the girls gang rape by the men, and some of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et anyone tries to introduce better form of it there is always behind something i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54925373134 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47117668131 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531343283582 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9185962241 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.2608695652 118.986275619 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.5652173913 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375609813569 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11272565516 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117341503783 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199748453524 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631218883453 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 14.1392134831 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.8420337079 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 12.1639044944 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.