Dealing with people such as influencing, and directing them on the right path is not as easy of a job as it seems. A person must put countless hours into polishing his or her soft skills and mastering the art of persuasion. For making a long-lasting impact, it must be made sure that a person is not getting involved in practices from which he gains short-term benefits at the expense of those in the future. Non-cooperation is tantamount to a definition of stupidity, since those who practice it, harm others without gaining anything for themselves. I mostly agree with the statement for three reasons.
First, when an individual is exposed to emotional conditions that are detrimental to his health, their productivity diminishes in the long run. Stress is a cause of major health issues including cardiovascular diseases and depression. Consequently, anxious feelings would manifest in daily activities such as oral and written communications, thereby lowering the effectiveness of disseminating ideas and stories to the world. In a society of conflict, peace of often difficult to observe. Disagreements lead to dichotomy among the population and may eventually harbor unrest. This is true and the statement, thus, does hold water. For instance, in Japan, people live longer lives, especially women, because of the regard they have for their peers.
Second, one who does not cooperate is not open to new opportunities. As the world has witnessed, closed systems do not last long and perish with time. This is because they fail to adopt the ideas of others. One should not throw away the ideas that one can use. For instance, the North Korean supreme leader Kim-Jong-Un had forsaken many imports and has imposed consumption of domestically produced goods and services, in the hope of promoting the country's development. The rules are so strict that one cannot find himself or herself a WiFi for connecting with the outside world. Such leadership comes at the expense of the well-being of the commoners. Before exercising a dogma, one should learn about its strengths and weaknesses.
Third, competitive people tend to be less productive. They end up spending time on activities that cause harm to other people, without actually gaining anything valuable from it. Not only it harms their reputation but also leads to a negative attitude toward the world. For instance, for an individual to become a great leader, one does not need to qualify for tests that check the recall of extensive factual information. In the effort of achieving this feat, many creative minds are forced to spend countless hours mugging information that perhaps would have no use in the future. This situation is the case in many Asian countries. Perhaps subtle flaws in our education systems have indoctrinated the belief that if we do not run faster, we will get decimated. This credence, in fact, is counterproductive.
In conclusion, although many would argue that striving to outstrip others leads to personal development, the long-term benefits do not outweigh those which would be achieved by cooperating with our contemporaries. If we are able to mold the thinking of the young generation in a way that fosters cooperation, it will change the world as we know it. Those who are reluctant to help others or haters who treat their fellow humans with scorn, do so at their own peril.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, third, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2822.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09386281588 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95381435156 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0273291953 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0322580645 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8709677419 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09677419355 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591389017791 0.243740707755 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0135734712277 0.0831039109588 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290134919711 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290090107477 0.150359130593 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170561743939 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.