Decisions indirectly affect our life, some in a minor way while others in a profound manner. It can range from following a healthy routine (such as regular exercise and salutary eating habits) to making life-settling decisions (such as investing wisely in real estate or choosing a supportive life partner). In the latter scenario, it is not inherently viable to solely act based on our emotions, and thus, trenchant analysis becomes imperative to decide whether the considered choice is rational or not. If not, then one must gird his or her loins for facing dire consequences. Therefore, I mostly agree with the statement for three reasons.
First, emotions can be damaging to a reputation. For example, if a political leader orders the armed forces to attack another nation, perhaps because of a random fit of anger, can lead to bitter relations and even long-lasting belligerence. Later, justifying the emotional outburst with a poorly backed logic is neither feasible nor praisable. Therefore, it is not okay to justify emotions with logic afterward.
Second, gut feelings are not necessarily always right. For example, in a situation involving investment in the stock markets, the consistent rise in the valuation of a company does not implicate that the firm will continue to make higher profits in the future. The idea is that the world is highly unpredictable and what our instinct might suggest does not guarantee successful results. If this is true, it significantly strengthens the statement presented.
Third, emotions can be influenced by the surrounding environment. A person’s milieu plays a key role in modulating his or her thought process. The presence of highly motivating or profoundly depressing peers in his or her social circles can drastically affect the ability to act rationally. On one hand, a business person will be more willing to take unnecessary risks while on the other, he or she will be circumspect and reluctant to invest money to expand his empire. Therefore, analysis becomes important before making decisive choices.
In conclusion, although many people are driven by emotions and seemingly exploit them while making day-to-day choices, it will be a mistake to not act rationally and consider all the nuances that may influence negative or even devastating ramifications. People who ignore the insidious effects of poorly made and emotionally backed decisions are both improvident and imprudent and do so at their own peril.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a minor way" with adverb for "minor"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...isions indirectly affect our life, some in a minor way while others in a profound manner. It c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a profound manner" with adverb for "profound"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... life, some in a minor way while others in a profound manner. It can range from following a healthy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28680203046 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97710975767 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.3774598713 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246992592074 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669253846069 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848533466341 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11796174108 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068362871865 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.