Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.
In accordance with statement, personal training or effort can achieve learning and school or college does not motivate the learning by itself. This statement does not take account that students starts from personal training first rather than learning from the school or college. Also, there should be a notion that students already know their interest and trying to go forward. Personal discipline can be secondary matter of learning but first should be a school and college teaching. School is the place where students can socialize and train with their friends. Further, during school years, competition can give more motivation to learn more. Finally, professor or teachers afford better advice how to learn than students themselves.
First and foremost, students learn and develop themselves by socialization. As though human is socializing animal, students will discuss and give information in classroom. They will have more inspiration or motivational thought to learn from the class because of socialization. For example, some high schools have discussion session that school teacher does not get into and students are the people who have instruction themselves. They choose one topic to discuss and they prepare for the next time. This type of class gives motivation by discussion in the class.
Secondly, students will have motivation when they have compete each other. Personal discipline cannot be controlled easily because there is no control. However, competition will help to boost learning. For example, Tom studied five hours a day but the Andy studied about eight hours a day. If Andy has forty percent better grade than Tom’s grade, then Tom probably try to study more about same or more than Andy to win. Therefore, if there is competition in class, then students put more effort to study more.
Finally, professors and teachers are the buffer to help students getting better. If some students are not eligible to understand the part of class, then teacher and professor does not doing their job, which means if they do not help them to follow, they should help to expedite student’s skills of learning. Students and professor have sometimes different directionality. However, if students ask question to professor, they will have at least different thought of process formation.
In conclusion, school or college is more likely to help learning because it helps socialization during class to learn more, and it gives competition to gain better grade, and professor and teachers will help to give direction what students have to go. Therefore, the best way to learning is motivated by school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 685, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
.... Finally, professor or teachers afford better advice how to learn than students thems...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'competed'.
Suggestion: competed
...nts will have motivation when they have compete each other. Personal discipline cannot ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...ss, then teacher and professor does not doing their job, which means if they do not h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as for, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32134292566 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72114529019 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474820143885 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3061238354 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.76 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.68 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304715616034 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991800021257 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847780038226 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175473749808 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109117808238 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.