Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de

Essay topics:

Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shake your position.

The statement said politician only follows common ground and harmonious agreement rather than elusive ideals. This statement does not account on the history factors and couldn’t make society better than previous circumstances. Great politician does not afraid of breaking the conventionality and pursue the valuable future. Further, they should focus more on the elusive ideals in order to at least get closer to whatever the elusive ideals are.

Great politician probably follows the conventionality and admit that convention is the way of having human society. However, in order to develop and increase level of society, there should be beyond reasonable consensus or commons ground. One of greatest politician in United States former president, Abraham Lincoln, he broke the conventional law about enslaving African-American by reunification of United States between north and south. By having civil war, there are hundreds and thousands of people dedication for reunification, Lincoln achieved emancipation of slavery, especially the south. In accordance with Lincoln, this is the type of making society better value in order to go forward by breaking barriers of conventionality.

Furthermore, politician pursuing elusive ideal will be more helpful to get closer than not even trying pursue. Some politicians might be frightened about how to assess the elusive ideals and they might not know how to pursue hard and difficult ideals. Although it is hardly achieve the value of ideal, politician should have temerity of confronting the originality. Recently times are fundamentally different from the previous society, which means politician couldn’t treat the society as they did before. For example, embryology has an ethical issue about how to make experiment process by not harming moral value. This is part of the society facing the problems and politician should have the solution and determination about how society go forward not backward.

Now it is the time to have politician focusing on elusive ideals because politician should confront and develop the society and further they are in the different epoch which couldn’t be dealt with conventionality. Therefore, politician should focus more on the elusive ideals.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the greatest'.
Suggestion: of the greatest
...onable consensus or commons ground. One of greatest politician in United States former pres...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'achieved'.
Suggestion: achieved
...difficult ideals. Although it is hardly achieve the value of ideal, politician should h...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, at least, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63235294118 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05641732282 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526470588235 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8628683839 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.647058824 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18722655635 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681909940339 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520648661036 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12668164991 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283082101949 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.