Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethics does.
The given statement says that the luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethics does. Some people believe that luck always has more impact on one’s success, while others believe that work ethics are vital to be more successful and established in a profession. I personally cannot deny the utility of a strong work ethic in pursuit of material success and professional recognition, but luck does play an important role in everybody’s life.
In almost every profession luck determines the success of the person, whether it is sports, film industry, technical industry etc. For example, in sports some has to wait for years to get chance to play an international match. Even though the players are very talented, they are unsure of getting place in the team. Sometimes they even get selected in the team but does not get chance to actually play in the match. Some people are very lucky in this case, they don’t have to wait for year to showcase their talent and gets a permanent place in the team. Also we can take the example of film industry, where many talented actors are forced to do lower grade movies to survive. Since, they don’t get chance to perform in movies they start doing something against their will. Instead of having talent and enthusiasm they end up like this. We can look at the actors who are fully established in their profession and preparing their sons and daughter to bring to the industry. Even though they are not talented as others are, they are still getting limelight because of their parent’s success. If this is not luck then what it is.
Its not always that luck determines one’s success. Sometimes, luck makes a person very successful but they end up being unsuccessful. If the luck has given opportunity then one should also fully utilise that to get benefit. For example, in film industry many actors who came and which where not skilled enough and did not improve themselves to meet the exception of people are no longer known. They got opportunity because of their relatives or parent’s in film industry. Many people show severe perseverance and dedicate themselves completely o achieve what they want. These people also get success, even if the luck had no part to play in their life. Luck sometimes brings success if hard work is also involved in that. Luck and success can be interdependent and sometimes dependent in deterring success.
In conclusion, I would say that the luck always has the upper hand, without luck even a hard work cannot succeed much. But I would also consider the work ethics without which even luck cannot bring success for long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Haymide | 54 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Geet@3 | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 54 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | Himanshi Rana | 50 | view |
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 30
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethics does. 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 58
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting ideas of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stablished in a profession. I personally cannot deny the utility of a strong work...
^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and gets a permanent place in the team. Also we can take the example of film industr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...because of their parent's success. If this is not luck then what it is. It...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...If this is not luck then what it is. Its not always that luck determines one&apo...
^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... success. Sometimes, luck makes a person very successful but they end up being un...
^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ful but they end up being unsuccessful. If the luck has given opportunity then one...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88716814159 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61302854947 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46017699115 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0859861996 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.36 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.08 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356693640055 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116738633914 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164881102455 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275513124318 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20657059846 0.0667264976115 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.