The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f

Essay topics:

The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into
truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Twenty-first century has experienced a tremendous spike in human utilization of luxury and convenient tools such as the internet, technology, and automatons. However, these trappings, which offer tremendous benefits to humanity, also poses threat to our lifestyle. While these menaces are not to be ignored, it will be undue to say these salutary devices stymie people from fully developing their true potentials.

To begin with, these luxuries have helped people circumvent quagmires. Internet for instance, has contributed a lot to the development of organizations and individuals around the globe. During the height of the recent Corona virus pandemic, the internet was the go-to locus for online classes, business meetings, research, and online courses. Imagine the world without internet during this imbroglio. People will be fraught with ennui. Hence, it will be unreasonable to say the internet, which helps people navigate through enigmas, poses perils to humans.

Additionally, these conveniences has helped facilitate living experience. Envisioning the world without technology, cities will not have developed into ultramodern urban milieus, and a lot problems will not have been solved. Phones and laptops, trams and planes, automatons and artificial intelligence has all helped to make life easier and more confortable. Thus, saying these wherewithals, which has helped make life simpler, hamper humans from developing into puissant individuals is ludicrous.

However, a reasonable person might cavil that these luxuries make people become slothful and renders informations invaluable. This might be true some extent. But we need to consider the beneficial side effects these conveniences offer. Researches, that made for prolonged time in the past, are now conducted within few days. Time is save. Energy is as well saved, In fact, resources are now being channeled to proper usage. Hence, saying these conveniences are detrimental is really disparaging.

In conclusion, posing little threat to human development, luxuries and conveniences has also contributed tremendously to people’s growth. Without these paraphernalias, it would be nearly impossible to achieve a conducive environment as we have in the globe today. Hence, these trappings should be seen as salubrious equipments rather than pernicious devices. Through this view, we would be able to appreciate the pioneers of these devices. The denouement of this is that more people will be encourage to contribute to the development of our dear planet.

Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 502, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: contributing
...s is that more people will be encourage to contribute to the development of our dear planet.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, really, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71164021164 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01919083257 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8313243566 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.36 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.12 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14557531941 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429355292723 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416754782312 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877133662929 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028078187933 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.