Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Necessity is the mother of invention. Prompt states that many important discoveries or creations are accidental. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly agree and bolster the statement for the following reason.
To begin with, discoveries or creation are a necessity for human life. The scientist gives their entire life to discover or create things or theory which to change the life of the coming generation. Sometimes it is blatant that accidents happen in their life, which forces them to think over it and that accident galvanizes them to create a theory. For an instant, one can exemplify when Newton was sitting under the apple tree he was not aware that Apple is going to fall from a tree on his head. When it did, he started thinking why everything that goes up entices towards the earth's surface? And this question crossed his mind due to a small accident that gives birth to the theory of gravity and on that theory or on the base of that theory whole world change.
However, sometimes it takes a huge accident to get galvanize and discovered new things. Most of the important discovery took place in Stone Age time and up to this day, we are depending on it. It is blatant that as technology is growing day by day it is replacing old inventions with a new one but the main principle is the same. For instance, thousands and millions of year ago in Stone Age, people use to preserve fire from a forest fire they use to bring ember from the forest and try to safe it as long as they could but one day some of them saw when two trees fall on one another it creates the fire and from that observation, fraction concept was invented when two objects are rubbed against each other it creates fraction which increases the temperature and causes the fire. From that day people learn to make fire and up to this day, fire is generated by using concept fraction.
Furthermore, when a scientist is working on their theory or discovery they are working on one goal but they reached another which gives different output and it is equally important as the first one. For instance, when a fountain pen was invented no one knew that it will not work in zero gravity it was discovered later that the fountain pen needs gravity to work so it will not work in zero gravity.
In conclusion, sometimes discoveries and creation are indeed accidental. This plays a major part in our day to day life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 60
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 63
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase of that theory whole world change. However, sometimes it takes a huge accid...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n Stone Age time and up to this day, we are depending on it. It is blatant that as technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...llions of year ago in Stone Age, people use to preserve fire from a forest fire the...
^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...o preserve fire from a forest fire they use to bring ember from the forest and try ...
^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'longs'?
Suggestion: longs
...r from the forest and try to safe it as long as they could but one day some of them ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 888, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is generated by using concept fraction. Furthermore, when a scientist is working...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58372093023 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46781445141 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479069767442 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.1055793617 60.3974514979 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133432694772 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475908789271 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468882212697 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792137896489 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275953967249 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.