Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
centuries, scientists are working tirelessly in the laboratories. Even when the research work didn’t reach a systematic laboratory-like approach, people used to apply thought process in order to enhance the way of working, which gave us the gifts of fire or wheel. Many of these researches never yielded their intended outcome, while some of them actually achieved the goals. However, there are indeed a few that went in a completely different direction, with the researcher, to his utter surprise, finding something that have proved quite useful in the history of mankind, but was never even dreamt of.
Otherwise what shall we call the discovery of some of the great medicines of all time – including penicillin, insulin, quinine, or even Viagra? Saccharine was discovered when the scientists were actually doing some chemical researches, forgot to wash hands, and found everything they touch with their hands taste sweet. They patented Sachharine which was a big deal during the world wars, as a replacement of sugar. Even microwaves, radioactivity or LSD fall into this serendipitous category of great accidental inventions.
We all know, Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays when he was experimenting with cathode ray tubes. He saw some rays leaking out of the container, and when he tried to put his hands to stop that emission, he clearly saw is bones are visible in the screen next to his hands.
It is said that Tea, the most widespread beverage in the world, was discovered by a Chinese emperor. He sat under a tree after an arduous day of travel, and served with some hot water. Suddenly a few leaves from the tree fell into the water, and when the emperor drank it, he had very refreshing feeling.
Viagra, originally intended to be a heart remedy, was found quite ineffective for heart patients, but those used it reported an increased erectile function. When experimented with this new objective, it has found to heal many patients with erectile dysfunction.
So it’s indeed agreeable to the original assertion that many discoveries were actually accidents, and not as per the originally followed plans. Still, they have made a huge difference in the world of mnkind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Centuries
centuries, scientists are working tirelessly in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en the research work didn't reach a systematic laboratory-like approach, peo...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...mankind, but was never even dreamt of. Otherwise what shall we call the discovery of som...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ise what shall we call the discovery of some of the great medicines of all time – including...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12534818942 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84510358542 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621169916435 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8626654594 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0437349519868 0.243740707755 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0148404466284 0.0831039109588 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024625564859 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0234588202447 0.150359130593 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152265811443 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.