Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and

Essay topics:

Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Scientists working diligently on there research have experienced, that breakthrough movement has oftend occured accidently. Thus, a researcher should be focused on his research, although they shouldn't be parochial and have to be open to the new answers received during their research. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that many discoveries are accidental implying that Inventors to be open towards the various answers they received during their research which are not having a direct bearing on their primary subject of focus.

To begin, Discoveries or in other words the unexplored realms is a celebral pursuit. One should be very focused and unorthodox as it requires you to be open to new interpretations which maybe not accepted in the current society standards. In additon, a scientist or researcher should be having an open mind while on this pursuit of finding the unknown. Since history has shown us that the major discoveries are accidental and while seeking an answer to a particualar problem we came across the answer to another. For instance, On one fine day with a clear sky a reserchers was working deligently, after couple of hours he started feeling lethargic. So he went in the courtyard and lied under an apple tree, after sometime suddenly an apple felt on him, at the movement when that apple detached from the tree started moving down towards him he discovered a phenomean known a the Law of Gravity and the sicentis was none other that the Newton himself. The above example illustrates that being equivocal and not being confined to a particular finding, in the process of discovery had been fruitful and led to the most groundbreaking discoveries.

Further, even if we stick to a particular topic of research hoping that the more time we devote much closer we are towards solving the mystery we are likely to be proven wrong because there are many scientist who have been working on their researcher lifetime and still are not able to produce any productive results. For instance, In this age of technology we seen many promos/advertisement regarding the new upcoming breakthroughs such as the battery getting charged in 10 seconds but still these kind of breakthrough are years away. Although if a researcher being open minded and applying the insights of these research found during the pursuit of 10 seconds charging, can significantly improve the present batteries which takes significant amount of time to charge. In other words, the important discoverise need you to be have independent mindset and not sticking to a certain outcome.

Of course, some may argue that in this fast changing world one need to be very focused and unambigious, only sticking to a particular question only then they will be able to answer it or able to discover. However, doing so dosen't garuntee you that it will certainly create something new?. On the other hand working deligently and having an open mind to welcome the findings of our understanding in other domains have produced likeable results and histroy is a proof of that.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... focused on his research, although they shouldnt be parochial and have to be open to the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 873, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...rds him he discovered a phenomean known a the Law of Gravity and the sicentis was non...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many scientists'.
Suggestion: many scientists
...ly to be proven wrong because there are many scientist who have been working on their research...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'scientists'?
Suggestion: scientists
... be proven wrong because there are many scientist who have been working on their research...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
... instance, In this age of technology we seen many promos/advertisement regarding the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...getting charged in 10 seconds but still these kind of breakthrough are years away. Althoug...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, then, thus, while, for instance, kind of, of course, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2574.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04705882353 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87174518633 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5667911185 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.411764706 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164906474437 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569894859024 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589556169299 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994997801165 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293903280439 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.