men and women, due to their physical inherence , not equally suitable for same types of jobs
The discussion about whether the male and female are appropriate for some types of task due to their dissimilar gender or not is a polemical one. I strongly agree with the statement and firmly believe that both the men and women are not perfectly eligible for the same jobs since their body constructio and stamina are not same. This essay will bolster my opinion.
Firstly, GOD created two different gender with the variation of physical appearance, workability, thinking power and so on. For example, if we consider two particulars of same age, one is from the masculine and other is from the feminine group, and let them to perform some weight lifting such as 40 kg or 50 kg. Both the male and female may not be show similar performance because of the variation of their body weight on average. Generally, the weight of the two aforesaid individuals is different, men have much energy than women without exceptional case. So, this will hinders their perfoemance.
Secondly, the patience level, the success rate of men and women iare not same in the same type of fields. For instance, a survey shows that, women can cool their mind in treamendous situation in case of household works. On the contrary, men can control the outside world like the performance of particulars in job sectors, business communication are beyond words. However, if one ask to do a man task of upbringing a baby, he will make a hodgepodge of that situation. As a result, the outcome will not good due to
In sum, it can be conclude that, both men and women are obvioulsly important for the society. But, they are not suitable equivalently for the similar types of jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd female are appropriate for some types of task due to their dissimilar gender o...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gender' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'genders'.
Suggestion: genders
.... Firstly, GOD created two different gender with the variation of physical appearan...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'hinder'
Suggestion: hinder
...without exceptional case. So, this will hinders their perfoemance. Secondly, the pat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79020979021 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69542095904 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7058815451 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369569827179 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109794573335 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849229789425 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228524414533 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690469286872 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.